David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In José Luis González Recio (ed.), Philosophical Essays on Physics and Biology. Georg Olms Verlag. 223-250 (2009)
We offer a review of some of the most influential views on the status of Reichenbach’s Principle of the Common Cause (RPCC) for genuinely indeterministic systems. We first argue that the RPCC is properly a conjunction of two distinct claims, one metaphysical and another methodological. Both claims can and have been contested in the literature, but here we simply assume that the metaphysical claim is correct, in order to focus our analysis on the status of the methodological claim. We briefly review the most entrenched or classical positions, including Salmon’s ‘interactive forks’, van Fraassen’s scepticism, and Cartwright’s generalisation of the fork criterion. We then go on to review the results of the ‘Budapest school’ on the existence of formally defined screening off events for any correlation —by means of the ideas of probability space extensibility and (Reichenbachian common cause) completability. We distinguish the Budapest doctrine clearly from any of the classical conceptions, and thus present an overall framework for discussions of causal inference in quantum mechanics. We argue that this review is preliminary essential work for a thorough assessment of the conditions under which RCCP may be a reliable tool for causal inference in a genuinely probabilistic (indeterministic) context.
|Keywords||Reichenbach's Principle of the Common Cause Indeterminism Quantum Mechanics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Elliott Sober (1984). Common Cause Explanation. Philosophy of Science 51 (2):212-241.
Iñaki San Pedro (2011). Venetian Sea Levels, British Bread Prices and the Principle of the Common Cause: A Reassessment. In H. de Regt, S. Okasha & S. Hartmann (eds.), EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer. 341-354.
Frank Arntzenius (1990). Physics and Common Causes. Synthese 82 (1):77 - 96.
Zalán Gyenis & Miklós Rédei (2011). Characterizing Common Cause Closed Probability Spaces. Philosophy of Science 78 (3):393-409.
G. Hofer-Szabó, M. Rédei & and LE Szabó (1999). On Reichenbach's Common Cause Principle and Reichenbach's Notion of Common Cause. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (3):377 - 399.
Jos Uffink (1999). The Principle of the Common Cause Faces the Bernstein Paradox. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):525.
Gábor Hofer-Szabó, Miklós Rédei & László E. Szabó (2002). Common-Causes Are Not Common Common-Causes. Philosophy of Science 69 (4):623-636.
Gábor Hofer‐Szabó (2002). Common‐Causes Are Not Common Common‐Causes. Philosophy of Science 69 (4):623-636.
Gabor Hofer-Szabo, Miklos Redei & Laszlo E. Szabo (2002). Common-Causes Are Not Common Common-Causes. Philosophy of Science 69 (4):623-636.
Marcel Weber (2005). Indeterminism in Neurobiology. Philosophy of Science 72 (5):663-674.
Brad Weslake (2006). Common Causes and the Direction of Causation. Minds and Machines 16 (3):239-257.
Elliott Sober (2001). Venetian Sea Levels, British Bread Prices, and the Principle of the Common Cause. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):331-346.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-04-08
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?