David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
This paper concerns the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) as a strategy for reinforcing democratic processes - broadly defined as "electronic democracy" practices - and focuses on the use of ICTs in participatory democracy initiatives. By considering the experience of the e-Participatory Budgeting in the city of Belo Horizonte (Brazil), the aim is to understand some of the possible prospects and limitations offered by ICTs in participatory processes at the local level. Considering the fact that the e-Participatory Budgeting took place in a city with 1.7 million electors and attained a level of participation of nearly 10%, the e-Participatory Budgeting of Belo Horizonte is, by any standards, one of the most significant initiatives in the world in the domain of e-democracy to have been implemented so far. Among other findings, this paper argues that even though the use of ICTs was essential to the success of the initiative, other factors were also crucial in accomplishing such a level of participation, notably: i) the scope of the public works at stake; ii) the salience of the initiative and iii) citizens' perception of their actual impact in the decision-making process. It is expected that the outcomes of this incipient research will contribute to the literature on electronic and participatory democracy, as well as providing a policy evaluation of the use of ICTs at the local level in a large-scale participatory initiative.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Emil Višňovský (2010). Democracy as Culture: Deweyan Pragmatism in a Globalized World (Review). Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (2):321-327.
Denise Vitale (2006). Between Deliberative and Participatory Democracy: A Contribution on Habermas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (6):739-766.
Griffin Trotter (2006). Bioethics and Deliberative Democracy: Five Warnings From Hobbes. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (3):235 – 250.
Douglas C. Walton (2007). Is Modern Information Technology Enabling the Evolution of a More Direct Democracy? World Futures 63 (5 & 6):365 – 385.
Mark Whipple (2005). The Dewey-Lippmann Debate Today: Communication Distortions, Reflective Agency, and Participatory Democracy. Sociological Theory 23 (2):156-178.
Wendy Barger & Ralph D. Barney (2004). Media-Citizen Reciprocity as a Moral Mandate. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 19 (3 & 4):191 – 206.
Laura C. Wilson & Angela Scarpa (2011). Level of Participatory Distress Experienced by Women in a Study of Childhood Abuse. Ethics and Behavior 22 (2):131 - 141.
Emil ViÅ¡ÅˆovskÃ½ (2010). Democracy as Culture: Deweyan Pragmatism in a Globalized World. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (2).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #252,512 of 1,899,871 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,347 of 1,899,871 )
How can I increase my downloads?