On poor and not so poor thought experiments. A reply to Daniel Cohnitz
Journal for General Philosophy of Science 38 (1):159 - 161 (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesThomas A. Horne (1985). "The Poor Have a Claim Founded in the Law of Nature": William Paley and the Rights of the Poor. Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (1):51-70.
Mathias Risse (2005). What We Owe to the Global Poor. Journal of Ethics 9 (1-2):81 - 117.
David Atkinson (2003). When Are Thought Experiments Poor Ones? Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 34 (2):305 - 322.
Jeanne Peijnenburg & David Atkinson (2003). When Are Thought Experiments Poor Ones? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 34 (2):305-322.
Daniel Cohnitz (2006). Poor Thought Experiments? A Comment on Peijnenburg and Atkinson. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 37 (2):373 - 392.
David Atkinson (2007). On Poor and Not so Poor Thought Experiments. A Reply to Daniel Cohnitz. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (1):159 - 161.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads11 ( #99,650 of 549,754 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 549,754 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
