Testing times: Questions concerning assessment for school improvement
Educational Philosophy and Theory 41 (3):342-361 (2009)
| Abstract | Contemporary education now appears to be dominated by the continual drive for improvement measured against the assessment of what students have learned. It is our contention that a foundational relation with assessment organises contemporary education. Here we draw on a 'way of thinking' that is deconstructive in its intent. Such thinking makes clear the vicious circularity of the argument for improvement, wherein assessment valorised in discourses of improvement provides not only a rationalisation for improvement via assessment, but also the very means of achieving such possibilities via targets grounded in limited specifications of assessment. On reading Heidegger's 'question concerning technology' we sought to reconsider the vicious circle of improvement in relation to Being. We claim that the means-ends driven technology of assessment, rather than being at our disposal and under our control, only serves to reveals the Real to us in accordance with the restricting principle of reason. The principle of reason, we argue, grounds 'Enframing' that ranks and orders the very beings of education as objects to produce an objective 'world as picture', rather than opening the possibility of their identity as belongings with a movement of difference. So, 'improvement' becomes normative and binding for institutions and practices on grounds of the principle of assessment, and renders agents of education as functionaries of 'Enframing'. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBarbara Skorupinski (2002). Putting Precaution to Debate – About the Precautionary Principle and Participatory Technology Assessment. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (1):87-102.
John Threlfall (2005). The Formative Use of Assessment Information in Planning: The Notion of Contingent Planning. British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (1):54 - 65.
Manfred Mai (2003). Technikbewertung Als Instrument der Politischen Gestaltung. �Ber Die Steuerbarkeit Moderner Gesellschaften. Poiesis and Praxis 1 (3):197-209.
Asher Seidel (1999). On Human Improvement. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (2):209-222.
Maddalena Taras (2005). Assessment: Summative and Formative: Some Theoretical Reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (4):466 - 478.
Robert L. Williams & Stephen L. Worth (2001). The Relationship of Critical Thinking to Success in College. Inquiry 21 (1):5-16.
Gordon Stobart (2001). The Validity of National Curriculum Assessment. British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (1):26 - 39.
Robert Coe (2009). School Improvement: Reality and Illusion. British Journal of Educational Studies 57 (4):363 - 379.
M. C. M. Ehren & A. J. Visscher (2008). The Relationships Between School Inspections, School Characteristics and School Improvement. British Journal of Educational Studies 56 (2):205 - 227.
Daniel Statman (1993). Self‐Assessment, Self‐Esteem and Self‐Acceptance. Journal of Moral Education 22 (1):55-62.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #114,014 of 549,065 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,065 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
