David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 190 (17):3777-3796 (2013)
Safety is a notion familiar to epistemologists principally because of the way in which it has been used in the attempt to cast light on the nature of knowledge. In particular, some have argued that an important constraint on knowledge is that one knows p only if one believes p safely. In this paper, I use safety for a different purpose: to cast light on the nature of assertion. I introduce what I call the safety account of assertion, according to which one asserts p properly only if one asserts p safely. The central idea is that an assertion’s propriety depends on whether one could easily have asserted falsely in a similar case. I argue that the safety account is well motivated, since it neatly explains our intuitions about a wide range of assertions of different kinds. Of particular interest is the fact that the account explains our intuitions about several kinds of assertions which appear to raise problems for well-known rival accounts
|Keywords||Assertion Knowledge Safety Norm|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Hawthorne (2003). Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford University Press.
Timothy Williamson (2000). Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford University Press.
Jason Stanley (2005). Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford University Press.
Duncan Pritchard (2005). Epistemic Luck. Clarendon Press.
Jennifer Lackey (2008). Learning From Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Charlie Pelling (2013). Assertion, Telling, and Epistemic Norms. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (2):1-14.
Geoff Pynn (2014). Assertibility and Sensitivity. Acta Analytica 29 (1):99-117.
Similar books and articles
Charlie Pelling (2013). Paradox and the Knowledge Account of Assertion. Erkenntnis 78 (5):977-978.
Martijn Blaauw & Jeroen de Ridder (2012). Unsafe Assertions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (4):1-5.
John Cantwell (2007). Reasoning With Safety Factor Rules. Techne 11 (1):55-70.
Charlie Pelling (2013). Assertion and The Provision of Knowledge. Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):293-312.
Christoph Kelp (2009). Knowledge and Safety. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:21-31.
James A. E. Macpherson (2008). Safety, Risk Acceptability, and Morality. Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):377-390.
Dani Rabinowitz, The Safety Condition for Knowledge. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Adam Leite (2007). How to Link Assertion and Knowledge Without Going Contextualist: A Reply to DeRose's "Assertion, Knowledge, and Context". Philosophical Studies 134 (2):111 - 129.
Avram Hiller & Ram Neta (2007). Safety and Epistemic Luck. Synthese 158 (3):303 - 313.
Frank Hindriks (2007). The Status of the Knowledge Account of Assertion. Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (3):393-406.
John Greco (2007). Worries About Pritchard's Safety. Synthese 158 (3):299 - 302.
Ian Proops (1997). The Early Wittgenstein on Logical Assertion. Philosophical Topics 25 (2):121-144.
Wayne H. Stewart, Donna E. Ledgerwood & Ruth C. May (1996). Educating Business Schools About Safety & Health is No Accident. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (8):919 - 926.
Added to index2012-12-02
Total downloads30 ( #132,498 of 1,906,957 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #345,326 of 1,906,957 )
How can I increase my downloads?