|Abstract||We investigate the notion of relevance as it pertains to ‘commonsense’, subjunctive conditionals. Relevance is taken here as a relation between a property (such as having a broken wing) and a conditional (such as birds typically fly). Specifically, we explore a notion of ‘causative’ relevance, distinct from ‘evidential’ relevance found, for example, in probabilistic approaches. A series of postulates characterising a minimal, parsimonious concept of relevance is developed. Along the way we argue that no purely logical account of relevance (even at the metalevel) is possible. Finally, and with minimal restrictions, an explicit definition that agrees with the postulates is given.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
John L. King (1976). Statistical Relevance and Explanatory Classification. Philosophical Studies 30 (5):313 - 321.
J. J. Moreso (1996). On Relevance and Justification of Legal Decisions. Erkenntnis 44 (1):73 - 100.
Madison Culler (1995). Beyond Bootstrapping: A New Account of Evidential Relevance. Philosophy of Science 62 (4):561-579.
Luciano Floridi (2008). Understanding Epistemic Relevance. Erkenntnis 69 (1):69 - 92.
David Christensen (1983). Glymour on Evidential Relevance. Philosophy of Science 50 (3):471-481.
Igal Kvart (1994). Causal Independence. Philosophy of Science 61 (1):96-114.
L. Jonathan Cohen (1994). Some Steps Towards a General Theory of Relevance. Synthese 101 (2):171 - 185.
James P. Delgrande & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (1998). A Formal Analysis of Relevance. Erkenntnis 49 (2):137-173.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #87,849 of 549,006 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,006 )
How can I increase my downloads?