David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Although advances in the underlying theory of a subdiscipline of AI can result in impressive increases in the performance of systems that employ such an underlying theory, this sometimes seems to be almost "by accident." The reason for this impression is that the impressive new advance in performance sometimes seems to be a feature merely of the specific example tests that are being demonstrated. And this impression is further strengthened when one notes that, in general, a localized theoretical advance is only rarely suflicient to increase the overall performance of any complex system. As a result of all these considerations, researchers who make theoretical advances are left desiring some method that would demonstrate that the advance really does have general, overall positive consequences for their system's performance.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Chaudhary Imran Sarwar (2013). Future of Ethically Effective Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics 113 (1):81-89.
Yei-Yi Chen & WenChang Fang (2008). The Moderating Effect of Impression Management on the Organizational Politics–Performance Relationship. Journal of Business Ethics 79 (3):263 - 277.
Victor S. Maas & Raquel Torres-González (2011). Subjective Performance Evaluation and Gender Discrimination. Journal of Business Ethics 101 (4):667-681.
Cláudia Sarrico, Maria Rosa, Pedro Teixeira & Margarida Cardoso (2010). Assessing Quality and Evaluating Performance in Higher Education: Worlds Apart or Complementary Views? Minerva 48 (1):35-54.
Stephen R. Hawk (1994). The Effects of Computerized Performance Monitoring: An Ethical Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (12):949 - 957.
Cedric E. Dawkins & John W. Fraas (2010). Beyond Acclamations and Excuses: Environmental Performance, Voluntary Environmental Disclosure, and the Role of Visibility. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 92 (4):655.
Luca Mari, Valentina Lazzarotti & Raffaella Manzini (2009). Measurement in Soft Systems: Epistemological Framework and a Case Study. Measurement 42 (2):241-253.
Robin Fretwell Wilson, Martha Neff-Smith, Donald Phillips & John C. Fletcher (1993). HECs: Are They Evaluating Their Performance? [REVIEW] HEC Forum 5 (1):1-34.
Gerald R. Ferris & Thomas R. King (1992). The Politics of Age Discrimination in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):341-350.
Andreas C. Lehmann (1998). Historical Increases in Expert Performance Suggest Large Possibilities for Improvement of Performance Without Implicating Innate Capacities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):419-420.
Niklas Luhmann (2008). Law as a Social System. OUP Oxford.
John Turri (2014). The Problem of ESEE Knowledge. Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy 1 (4):101-127.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads7 ( #439,779 of 1,911,323 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #455,910 of 1,911,323 )
How can I increase my downloads?