David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sociological Theory 14 (1):30-48 (1996)
In previous decades, a regrettable divorce has arisen between two currents of theorizing and research about knowledge and science: the Mannheimian and Wittgensteinian traditions. The radical impulse of the new social studies of science in the early 1970s was initiated not by followers of Mannheim, but by Wittgensteinians such as Kuhn, Bloor, and Collins. This paper inquires whether this Wittgensteinian program is not presently running into difficulties that might be resolved to some extent by reverting to a more traditional and broader agenda of research. A social theory of knowledge (or social epistemology) along Mannheimian lines would not only reinstate the "magic triangle" of epistemology, sociology, and ethics, and hence revive the vexed problem of "ideology critique," but would also need to reincorporate the social analysis of science into a broader macrosocial theory about the "knowledge society."
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Markus Seidel (2011). Relativism or Relationism? A Mannheimian Interpretation of Fleck's Claims About Relativism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (2):219-240.
Francesco Coniglione (2009). Introduction: The Coming of the Knowledge Society and the Challenges for the Future of Europe. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 19 (4):353-372.
Chunglin Kwa (2012). An “Ecological” View of Styles of Science and of Art: Alois Riegl's Explorations of the Style Concept. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (4):610-618.
David Kaiser (1998). A Mannheim for All Seasons: Bloor, Merton, and the Roots of the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Science in Context 11 (1).
Similar books and articles
A. P. Simonds (1978). Karl Mannheim's Sociology of Knowledge. Clarendon Press.
Bernard Susser (1989). The Sociology of Knowledge and its Enemies. Inquiry 32 (3):245 – 260.
Brian Longhurst (1989). Karl Mannheim and the Contemporary Sociology of Knowledge. St. Martin's Press.
Markus Seidel (2011). Karl Mannheim, Relativism and Knowledge in the Natural Sciences – A Deviant Interpretation. In Richard Schantz & Markus Seidel (eds.), The Problem of Relativism in the Sociology of (Scientific) Knowledge. Ontos
Francis Warren Rempel (1965). The Role of Value in Karl Mannheim's Sociology of Knowledge. The Hague, Mouton.
Karl Mannheim (1952). Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. New York, Oxford University Press.
András Karácsony (2008). Soul-Life-Knowledge: The Young Mannheim's Way to Sociology. Studies in East European Thought 60 (1/2):97 - 111.
G. Dahl (1994). Documentary Meaning- Understanding or Critique?: Karl Mannheim's Early Sociology of Knowledge. Philosophy and Social Criticism 20 (1-2):103-121.
Gunter W. Remmling (1975). The Sociology of Karl Mannheim: With a Bibliographical Guide to the Sociology of Knowledge, Ideological Analysis, and Social Planning. Routledge & K. Paul.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #94,044 of 1,700,361 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #206,271 of 1,700,361 )
How can I increase my downloads?