David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (6):469-486 (2005)
Moral absolutes have little or no moral standing in our morally diverse modern society. Moral relativism is far more palatable for most ethicists and to the public at large. Yet, when pressed, every moral relativist will finally admit that there are some things which ought never be done. It is the rarest of moral relativists that will take rape, murder, theft, child sacrifice as morally neutral choices. In general ethics, the list of those things that must never be done will vary from person to person. In clinical ethics, however, the nature of the physician–patient relationship is such that certain moral absolutes are essential to the attainment of the good of the patient – the end of the relationship itself. These are all derivatives of the first moral absolute of all morality: Do good and avoid evil. In the clinical encounter, this absolute entails several subsidiary absolutes – act for the good of the patient, do not kill, keep promises, protect the dignity of the patient, do not lie, avoid complicity with evil. Each absolute is intrinsic to the healing and helping ends of the clinical encounter.
|Keywords||clinical encounter dignity moral absolute moral relativism physician–patient relationship The good of the patient|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A. Ravelingien, J. Braeckman, L. Crevits, D. De Ridder & E. Mortier (2009). 'Cosmetic Neurology' and the Moral Complicity Argument. Neuroethics 2 (3):151-162.
Roger A. Newham (2013). An Internal Morality of Nursing: What It Can and Cannot Do. Nursing Philosophy 14 (2):109-116.
Similar books and articles
Simon P. James (2011). For the Sake of a Stone? Inanimate Things and the Demands of Morality. Inquiry 54 (4):384-397.
Raymond J. Devettere (1993). Clinical Ethics and Happiness. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):71-89.
F. Daniel Davis (1997). Phronesis, Clinical Reasoning, and Pellegrino's Philosophy of Medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (1-2).
Dan C. English (2005). Moral Obligations of Patients: A Clinical View. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):139 – 152.
Lynn A. Jansen (1998). Assessing Clinical Pragmatism. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (1):23-36.
John Puma & David L. Schiedermayer (1991). The Clinical Ethicist at the Bedside. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
Stuart G. Finder & Mark J. Bliton (2011). Responsibility After the Apparent End: 'Following-Up' in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Bioethics 25 (7):413-424.
Edmund D. Pellegrino (2008). The Philosophy of Medicine Reborn: A Pellegrino Reader. University of Notre Dame Press.
Eric Racine (2008). Enriching Our Views on Clinical Ethics: Results of a Qualitative Study of the Moral Psychology of Healthcare Ethics Committee Members. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (1):57-67.
Edmund D. Pellegrino (2001). The Internal Morality of Clinical Medicine: A Paradigm for the Ethics of the Helping and Healing Professions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (6):559 – 579.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads79 ( #18,292 of 1,100,092 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #66,996 of 1,100,092 )
How can I increase my downloads?