|Abstract||Advances in the underlying theory of a subdiscipline of AI can result in an apparently impressive improvement in the performance of a system that incorporates the advance. This impression typically comes from observing improved performance of the new system on some test problems. However, the improvement in performance may be for only the problems used in the testing, and performance on other problems may be degraded, possibly resulting overall in an degradation of the system’s performance. This comes about typically when the incorporation of the new feature increases the resources required overall, but the feature has bene- ﬁts on only some problems (e.g., those used to test the new new system). In general, a localized theoretical advance is only rarely sufﬁcient to increase the overall performance of any complex system. Therefore, researchers who make theoretical advances, also need some way to demonstrate that an advance really does have general, overall positive consequences for system..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Stephen R. Hawk (1994). The Effects of Computerized Performance Monitoring: An Ethical Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (12):949 - 957.
Andreas C. Lehmann (1998). Historical Increases in Expert Performance Suggest Large Possibilities for Improvement of Performance Without Implicating Innate Capacities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):419-420.
Christopher Manning, A System For Identifying Named Entities in Biomedical Text: How Results From Two Evaluations Reﬂect on Both the System and the Evaluations.
Rui Nunes, Cristina Brandão & Guilhermina Rego (2011). Public Accountability and Sunshine Healthcare Regulation. Health Care Analysis 19 (4):352-364.
Luca Mari, Valentina Lazzarotti & Raffaella Manzini (2009). Measurement in Soft Systems: Epistemological Framework and a Case Study. Measurement 42 (2):241-253.
Christopher Knapp (2007). Assessing Grading. Public Affairs Quarterly 21 (3):275-294.
Marc Ereshefsky (1994). Some Problems with the Linnaean Hierarchy. Philosophy of Science 61 (2):186-205.
Marguerite Schneider & Alix Valenti (2008). The Effects of “Going Private” on Corporate Financial and Corporate Social Performance. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:236-245.
Péter Érdi (1993). Neurodynamic System Theory: Scope and Limits. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (2).
Michael McCubbin & David Cohen (1999). A Systemic and Value-Based Approach to Strategic Reform of the Mental Health System. Health Care Analysis 7 (1):57-77.
Mark Cordano, Stephanie Welcomer & Andrew Griffiths (2007). The Benefits of Structural Equation Modeling for Developing and Testing Corporate Social Performance Theory. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:121-125.
P. D. Magnus (2008). Mag Uidhir on Performance. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (3):338-345.
Sik-Fun Lee, The Use of Chinese Philosophies to Assist Achievement of World-Class Business Excellence.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-12-22
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?