Vacuous relatives and the (non-) context-freeness of English
Linguistics and Philosophy 11 (3):255 - 260 (1988)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRaimon Elgueta (1999). Freeness in Classes Without Equality. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):1159-1194.
Eric Hauser (2010). Designing an Opinion for its (Local) Context. Human Studies 33 (4):395-410.
Jonathan R. Scarff & Steven Lippmann (2012). When Physicians Intervene in Their Relatives' Health Care. HEC Forum 24 (2):127-137.
Geoffrey K. Pullum & Kyle Rawlins (2007). Argument or No Argument? Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (2):277 - 287.
Stuart M. Shieber (1985). Evidence Against the Context-Freeness of Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy 8 (3):333 - 343.
Ali Kazmi & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (1998). Is Compositionality Formally Vacuous? Linguistics and Philosophy 21 (6):629-633.
James Hull (2010). Let Freeness Ring: The Canadian Standard Freeness Tester as Hegemonic Engine. Spontaneous Generations 4 (1).
Gerhard Jäger (2004). Residuation, Structural Rules and Context Freeness. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (1):47-59.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,652 of 549,069 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
