On understanding understanding

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (1):7 – 20 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is argued, by use of specific examples, that mathematical understanding is something which cannot be modelled in terms of entirely computational procedures. Our conception of a natural number (a non-negative integer: 0, 1, 2, 3,…) is something which goes beyond any formulation in terms of computational rules. Our ability to perceive the properties of natural numbers depends upon our awareness, and represents just one of the many ways in which awareness provides an essential ingredient to our ability to understand. There is no bar to the quality of understanding being the result of natural selection, but only so long as the physical laws contain a non-computational ingredient.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Simulation and the sense of understanding.Jaakko Kuorikoski - 2011 - In Paul Humphreys & Cyrille Imbert (eds.), Models, Simulations, and Representations. London: Routledge. pp. 168-187.
Life as understanding.Günter Figal - 2004 - Research in Phenomenology 34 (1):20-30.
The epistemology of understanding.Neil Cooper - 1995 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):205 – 215.
Computing Machinery and Understanding.Michael Ramscar - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (6):966-971.
Contexts of understanding.Herman Parret - 1980 - Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Understanding, excusing, forgiving.Glen Pettigrove - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):156–175.
How understanding makes knowledge valuable.Ayca Boylu - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):591-609.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
305 (#59,894)

6 months
45 (#79,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?