David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):643-705 (1990)
The emperor's new mind (hereafter Emperor) is an attempt to put forward a scientific alternative to the viewpoint of according to which mental activity is merely the acting out of some algorithmic procedure. John Searle and other thinkers have likewise argued that mere calculation does not, of itself, evoke conscious mental attributes, such as understanding or intentionality, but they are still prepared to accept the action the brain, like that of any other physical object, could in principle be simulated by a computer. In Emperor I go further than this and suggest that the outward manifestations ofconscious mental activity cannot even be properly simulated by calculation. To support this view, I use various arguments to show that the results of mathematical insight, in particular, do not seem to be obtained algorithmically. The main thrust ofthis work, however, is to present an overview ofthe present state of physical understanding and to show that an important gap exists at the point where, quantum and classical physics meet, as well as to speculate on how the conscious brain might be taking advantage ofwhatever new physics is needed to fill this gap to achieve its nonalgorithmic effects
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Colin Hales (2011). On the Status of Computationalism as a Law of Nature. International Journal of Machine Consciousness 3 (01):55-89.
Roger Penrose (1993). An Emperor Still Without Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (3):616.
Eyal M. Reingold (1992). Conscious Versus Unconscious Processes: Are They Qualitatively Different? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (2):218-219.
Michael V. Antony (1992). The Where and When of What? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (2):201-202.
Bruce Bridgeman (1992). What is Consciousness for, Anyway? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (2):206-207.
Similar books and articles
H. Mattingly (1935). The Emperor Gaius J. P. V. D. Balsdon : The Emperor Gaius (Caligula). Pp. Xix + 243. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1934. Cloth, 10s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 49 (04):146-147.
Catharine Edwards (1992). A Crazy Emperor? Arther Ferrill: Caligula: Emperor of Rome. Pp. 184; 19 Illustrations. London: Thames and Hudson, 1991. £12.95. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (01):114-115.
Miriam Griffin (1993). The Unlikeable Emperor Brian W. Jones: The Emperor Domitian. Pp. Xi + 292. London and New York: Routledge, 1992. £30.00. The Classical Review 43 (01):113-116.
Paul Veyne (2003). What Was a Roman Emperor? Emperor, Therefore a God. Diogenes 50 (3):3-21.
Roger Penrose (1999). The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. OUP Oxford.
Roger Penrose (1989). The Emperor's New Mind. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #305,979 of 1,088,372 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,449 of 1,088,372 )
How can I increase my downloads?