David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):643-705 (1990)
The emperor's new mind (hereafter Emperor) is an attempt to put forward a scientific alternative to the viewpoint of according to which mental activity is merely the acting out of some algorithmic procedure. John Searle and other thinkers have likewise argued that mere calculation does not, of itself, evoke conscious mental attributes, such as understanding or intentionality, but they are still prepared to accept the action the brain, like that of any other physical object, could in principle be simulated by a computer. In Emperor I go further than this and suggest that the outward manifestations ofconscious mental activity cannot even be properly simulated by calculation. To support this view, I use various arguments to show that the results of mathematical insight, in particular, do not seem to be obtained algorithmically. The main thrust ofthis work, however, is to present an overview ofthe present state of physical understanding and to show that an important gap exists at the point where, quantum and classical physics meet, as well as to speculate on how the conscious brain might be taking advantage ofwhatever new physics is needed to fill this gap to achieve its nonalgorithmic effects
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Nagel (1979). Mortal Questions. Cambridge University Press.
Gilbert Ryle (1949). The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson and Co.
Karl R. Popper & John C. Eccles (1977). The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism. Springer.
Stephen P. Stich (1983). From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief. MIT Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Daniel C. Dennett & Marcel Kinsbourne (1992). Time and the Observer: The Where and When of Consciousness in the Brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (2):183-201.
Ned Block (1992). Begging the Question Against Phenomenal Consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (2):205-206.
Luciano Floridi (2004). Open Problems in the Philosophy of Information. Metaphilosophy 35 (4):554-582.
M. Jeannerod (1992). The Where in the Brain Determines the When in the Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (2):212-213.
Daniel C. Dennett & Marcel Kinsbourne (1992). Escape From the Cartesian Theater. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (2):234-247.
Similar books and articles
Roger Penrose (1999). The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. OUP Oxford.
Paul Veyne (2003). What Was a Roman Emperor? Emperor, Therefore a God. Diogenes 50 (3):3-21.
Miriam Griffin (1993). The Unlikeable Emperor Brian W. Jones: The Emperor Domitian. Pp. Xi + 292. London and New York: Routledge, 1992. £30.00. The Classical Review 43 (01):113-116.
Catharine Edwards (1992). A Crazy Emperor? Arther Ferrill: Caligula: Emperor of Rome. Pp. 184; 19 Illustrations. London: Thames and Hudson, 1991. £12.95. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (01):114-115.
H. Mattingly (1935). The Emperor Gaius J. P. V. D. Balsdon : The Emperor Gaius (Caligula). Pp. Xix + 243. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1934. Cloth, 10s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 49 (04):146-147.
Roger Penrose (1989). The Emperor's New Mind. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #216,824 of 1,934,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,883 of 1,934,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?