Reply to professor Hoekstra

Journal of Philosophy 42 (4):101-108 (1945)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

0022362X

DOI

10.2307/2019666

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Social contracts and corporations: A reply to Hodapp. [REVIEW]Thomas Donaldson - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (2):133 - 137.
On a descriptive theory of value a reply to professor Margolis.Stephen C. Pepper - 1969 - Zygon 4 (3):261-265.
Pepper's world hypotheses.Raymond Hoekstra - 1945 - Journal of Philosophy 42 (4):85-101.
Is the work of art a construct? A reply to professor Pepper.Donald F. Henze - 1955 - Journal of Philosophy 52 (16):433-439.
Reply to Professor Brender and Professor Byrne.Phillip Cole - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:197-206.
The second epistemic way revisited: Reply to professor beard's, 'professor Lucas on omniscience'. [REVIEW]Billy Joe Lucas - 1997 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (3):143-162.
I. mathematical modeling of election predictions: Final reply to professor Aubert.Herbert A. Simon - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):231 – 232.
Logical constructivism, modal logic, and metaphysics: A reply to professor Pruss' ``professor Lucas' second epistemic way''. [REVIEW]Billy Joe Lucas - 2002 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 52 (3):143-157.
Art and truth, in reply to mr. Weitz.Raymond Hoekstra - 1944 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5 (3):365-378.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
37 (#420,900)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references