Some comments on professor kahn’s paper

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 9 (1):51-55 (1950)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/426102

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Comments on professor Derrida's paper.Richard Popkin - 1969 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30 (1):58-65.
Comments on professor Hartshorne's paper: Comments.Richard Rorty - 1963 - Journal of Philosophy 60 (21):606-608.
Comments on professor Putnam's comments.H. Margenau & E. P. Wigner - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (3):292-293.
I. mathematical modeling of election predictions: Final reply to professor Aubert.Herbert A. Simon - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):231 – 232.
Comments on Professor Benacerraf's Paper.James Thomson - 1970 - In Wesley Charles Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Bobbs-Merrill. pp. 130--138.
Comments on Professor Schouls' Paper.J. W. Yolton - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (4):611 - 615.
The status of the potential: A reply to professor Dewey.Sholom J. Kahn - 1948 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (4):714-716.
Comments on professor Postow's paper.Roderick Firth - 1978 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (1):122-123.
Critical judgment and professor pepper’s “eclecticism”.Sholom J. Kahn - 1950 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 9 (1):46-50.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
27 (#554,860)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references