To see or not to see, that is the question: Designing experiments to test perspective-taking in nonhumans
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):128-129 (1998)
|Abstract||Heyes argues that we need alternative experiments to study those animal abilities generally considered to involve “theory of mind.” The studies she proposes, however, have as many problems as those that she criticizes. Further interactions should exist among researchers examining these capacities before additional experiments are undertaken.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alisa Bokulich (2001). Rethinking Thought Experiments. Perspectives on Science 9 (3):285-307.
Albert Newen & Kai Vogeley (2003). Self-Representation: Searching for a Neural Signature of Self-Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 12 (4):529-543.
Susan J. Blackmore (2001). Three Experiments to Test the Sensorimotor Theory of Vision. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):977-977.
Daniel Brian Krupp, Pat Barclay, Martin Daly, Toko Kiyonari, Greg Dingle & Margo Wilson (2005). Let's Add Some Psychology (and Maybe Even Some Evolution) to the Mix. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):828-829.
Martin K. Jones (2008). On the Autonomy of Experiments in Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (4):391-407.
John Zeimbekis (2011). Thought Experiments and Mental Simulations. In Katerina Ierodiakonou & Sophie Roux (eds.), Thought Experiments in Methodological and Historical Contexts. Brill.
Andrew Whiten (1998). How Imitators Represent the Imitated: The Vital Experiments. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):707-708.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #201,838 of 549,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?