A Reductio Ad Absurdum of Restricted, Tribal Criminal Jurisdiction
International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):253-262 (2004)
| Abstract | As Federal Indian Law has evolved, many questions have been posed regarding tribal jurisdiction. This paper examines the jurisdiction tribes have over member Indians, non-member Indians, and non-member, non-Indians. It addresses the ethical challenge faced by tribal attorneys who represent non-member Indian clients in a manner that ultimately undermines tribal sovereignty | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDavid Lulka (2008). Social Splinters and Cross-Cultural Leanings: A Cartographic Method for Examining Environmental Ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (3).
Edward Mussawir (2011). Jurisdiction in Deleuze: The Expression and Representation of Law. Routledge.
Shlomit Wallerstein (forthcoming). Delegation of Powers and Authority in International Criminal Law. Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-18.
Mireille Hildebrandt (2010). The Indeterminacy of an Emergency: Challenges to Criminal Jurisdiction in Constitutional Democracy. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (2):161-181.
Nicholas Rescher, Reductio Ad Absurdum. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Alejandro Chehtman (2010). The Philosophical Foundations of Extraterritorial Punishment. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-01-09Total downloads3 ( #202,008 of 549,127 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,127 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
