David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 10 (2):101 – 114 (2000)
What have modern Buddhist ethicists to say about abortion and is there anything to be learned from it? A number of writers have suggested that Buddhism (particularly Japanese Buddhism) does indeed have something important to offer here: a response to the dilemma of abortion that is a 'middle way' between the pro-choice and pro-life extremes that have polarised the western debate. I discuss what this suggestion might amount to and present a defence of its plausibility.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
S. Tachibana (1992/1975). The Ethics of Buddhism. Curzon Press.
Adrian Konik (2009). Buddhism and Transgression: The Appropriation of Buddhism in the Contemporary West. Brill.
Jeremy Williams (2012). Sex-Selective Abortion: A Matter of Choice. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 31 (2):125-159.
David Burton (2001). Is Madhyamaka Buddhism Really the Middle Way? Emptiness and the Problem of Nihilism. Contemporary Buddhism 2 (2):177-190.
David F. Walbert (1973). Abortion, Society, and the Law. Cleveland [Ohio]Press of Case Western Reserve University.
R. W. Perrett (1999). Buddhism and Abortion. Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (5):424-425.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads101 ( #12,089 of 1,100,137 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #90,386 of 1,100,137 )
How can I increase my downloads?