David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 10 (2):101 – 114 (2000)
What have modern Buddhist ethicists to say about abortion and is there anything to be learned from it? A number of writers have suggested that Buddhism (particularly Japanese Buddhism) does indeed have something important to offer here: a response to the dilemma of abortion that is a 'middle way' between the pro-choice and pro-life extremes that have polarised the western debate. I discuss what this suggestion might amount to and present a defence of its plausibility.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Fuchuan Yao (2008). The Compatibility Between Bodhisattva Compassion and 'No-Self'. Asian Philosophy 18 (3):267 – 278.
Similar books and articles
S. Tachibana (1992). The Ethics of Buddhism. Curzon Press.
Walter Block (2010). Rejoinder to Wisniewski on Abortion. Libertarian Papers 2.
R. W. Perrett (1999). Buddhism and Abortion. Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (5):424-425.
David F. Walbert (1973). Abortion, Society, and the Law. Cleveland [Ohio]Press of Case Western Reserve University.
David Burton (2001). Is Madhyamaka Buddhism Really the Middle Way? Emptiness and the Problem of Nihilism. Contemporary Buddhism 2 (2):177-190.
Jeremy Williams (2012). Sex-Selective Abortion: A Matter of Choice. Law and Philosophy 31 (2):125-159.
Adrian Konik (2009). Buddhism and Transgression: The Appropriation of Buddhism in the Contemporary West. Brill.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads106 ( #39,335 of 1,934,588 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,469 of 1,934,588 )
How can I increase my downloads?