Compatibilism and the free will defence: A reply to Bishop

Australasian Journal of Philosopy 77 (1):92-105 (1999)
This paper 1) argues that libertarians are virtually as badly off as compatibilists in the face of the objection to the Free Will Defence that omnipotent God could have ensured that all free beings always but freely did right, and 2) explores the prospects for an "upgraded" Free Will Defense which takes freedom merely as a necessary condition for a further higher good which logically could not be achieved if God employed any of the available strategies--under both compatibilist and libertarian assumptions--for creating morally free beings without the risk of moral evil
Keywords Compatibilism  Free Will  God  Religion  Bishop, J  Plantinga, A
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00048409912348841
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Heimir Geirsson (2005). What God Could Have Made. Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):355-376.
Michael Losonsky & Heimir Geirsson (2005). What God Could Have Made. Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):355-376.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

35 ( #93,308 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #118,705 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.