David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 131 (1):129 - 143 (2002)
The possibility of apparently negative causation has been discussed in a number of recent works on causation, but the discussion has suffered from beingscattered. In this paper, the problem of apparently negative causation and its attemptedsolutions are examined in more detail. I discuss and discard three attempts that have beensuggested in the literature. My conclusion is negative: Negative causation shows that thetraditional cause & effect view is inadequate. A more unified causal perspective is needed.
|Keywords||causation causal relata causation by absences Mellor|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Uwe Meixner (2004). Causation in a New Old Key. Studia Logica 76 (3):343 - 383.
Brad Weslake (forthcoming). A Partial Theory of Actual Causation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Jan Faye, Backward Causation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
D. Benjamin Barros (2013). Negative Causation in Causal and Mechanistic Explanation. Synthese 190 (3):449-469.
Jonathan Schaffer (2004). Causes Need Not Be Physically Connected to Their Effects: The Case for Negative Causation. In Christopher Read Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science. Basil Blackwell. 197--216.
Menno Hulswit (2005). How Causal is Downward Causation? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 36 (2):261 - 287.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #43,436 of 1,004,639 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #28,116 of 1,004,639 )
How can I increase my downloads?