International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (3):377-394 (2011)
|Abstract||In a remarkable early paper, Wilfrid Sellars warned us that if we cease to recognize rules, we may well find ourselves walking on four feet; and it is obvious that within human communities, the phenomenon of rules is ubiquitous. Yet from the viewpoint of the sciences, rules cannot be easily accounted for. Sellars himself, during his later years, managed to put a lot of flesh on the normative bones from which he assembled the remarkable skeleton of the early paper; and his followers too. However, what they say is somewhat divergent; and therefore my aim in this paper is to concentrate on the very concept of rule and analyse it in the context of the question what it is about us humans that makes us special|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. Hage (2000). Rule Consistency. Law and Philosophy 19 (3):369-390.
Gary Marcus (2005). Opposites Detract: Why Rules and Similarity Should Not Be Viewed as Opposite Ends of a Continuum. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):28-29.
Jaroslav Peregrin (2011). The Use-Theory of Meaning and the Rules of Our Language Games. In K. Turner (ed.), Making semantics pragmatic. Emerald.
Jacob Paroush (1997). Order Relations Among Efficient Decision Rules. Theory and Decision 43 (3):209-218.
Julia Tanney (2009). Real Rules. Synthese 171 (3).
Yde Venema (1993). Derivation Rules as Anti-Axioms in Modal Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (3):1003-1034.
Added to index2009-03-18
Total downloads20 ( #61,609 of 551,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 551,007 )
How can I increase my downloads?