David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (2):153-170 (2012)
There is currently a gap in our understanding of how figures produced by mechanical imaging techniques play evidential roles: several studies based on close examination of scientific practice show that imaging techniques do not yield data whose significance can simply be read off the image. If image-making technology is not a simple matter of nature re-presenting itself to us in a legible way, just how do the images produced provide support for scientific claims? In this article I will first show that there is a distinct question about the semiotics of mechanically produced images that has not yet been answered. I show that my account of visual representations can do so, and I argue that the role of convention involved in my account is compatible with the view that visual representations produced through mechanized imaging techniques can play genuine evidential roles in scientific reasoning
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Ian Hacking (1983). Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press.
Lorraine Daston (2007). Objectivity. Distributed by the MIT Press.
Bas C. Van Fraassen (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press.
Ronald N. Giere (2006). Scientific Perspectivism. University of Chicago Press.
James Bogen & James Woodward (1988). Saving the Phenomena. Philosophical Review 97 (3):303-352.
Citations of this work BETA
Nicola Mößner (2015). Visual Information and Scientific Understanding. Axiomathes 25 (2):167-179.
Jutta Schickore (forthcoming). Exploratory Experimentation” as a Probe Into the Relation Between Historiography and Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.
Similar books and articles
Robert Rosenberger (2013). Mediating Mars: Perceptual Experience and Scientific Imaging Technologies. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 18 (1):75-91.
Bogdan Nita (2012). Intentional Image and Transcendental Image in the Work of Art. Image 2 (2321):231.
Lambert Wiesing (2011). Pause of Participation. On the Function of Artificial Presence. Research in Phenomenology 41 (2):238-252.
Keith Lehrer (2012). The Unity of the Manifest and Scientific Image by Self-Representation. Humana.Mente - Journal of Philosophical Studies 21.
Stephen David Ross (2009). For Giving. International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:469-504.
Peter Osborne (2010). Infinite Exchange: The Social Ontology of the Photographic Image. Philosophy of Photography 1 (1):59-68.
Michael Lynch & Ruth McNally, Encadenando a Un Monstruo : La Produccion de Representaciones En Un Campu Impuro.
W. R. Webster (2002). A Case of Mind/Brain Identity: One Small Bridge for the Explanatory Gap. Synthese 131 (2):275-287.
Dawn M. Phillips (2009). Fixing the Image: Re-Thinking the 'Mind-Independence' of Photographs. Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics 6 (2):1-22.
Jay L. Garfield (2012). Sellarsian Synopsis: Integrating the Images. Humana.Mente - Journal of Philosophical Studies 21.
John Douglas Bishop (2000). Is Self-Identity Image Advertising Ethical? Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (2):371-398.
Anthony Uhlmann (2006). Samuel Beckett and the Philosophical Image. Cambridge University Press.
Xiaoqiang Han (2008). Image-Based de Re Thought. Disputatio 2 (24):17.
Added to index2012-10-06
Total downloads20 ( #142,353 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?