Philosophical Quarterly 39 (155):190-199 (1989)
|Abstract||This paper is in three sections. In the first I describe and illustrate three uses of indices of truth in semantics. The way I illustrate this classification is not completely uncontroversial, but I expect that my intuitions on this matter are generally shared. In the second section I broach a question which is central to the metaphysics of time, namely: how should certain temporal indices of truth - times - be fitted within this classificatory scheme? I sketch three proposals as to how this might be done, and show how they constitute different metaphysical conceptions of the nature of time. Finally, in the third section I turn to a specific problem with the classification of times (as indices of truth) I call 'non-indexical'. Mellor (1981) thinks this problem insoluble, and argues that it shows this classification to be absurd. However, by appealing to the modal analogues of the issues involved, I first show that Mellor's argument is question- begging, and then go on to show how the non-indexical classification of times might undermine the presuppositions on which his argument rests. The paper attempts to contribute to a discussion of the question raised in section II, not to provide a definitive answer to it|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
T. Sattig (2003). Temporal Predication with Temporal Parts and Temporal Counterparts. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):355 – 368.
Michael Glanzberg (2005). Presuppositions, Truth Values, and Expressing Propositions. In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Oxford University Press.
Thomas Pogge (2009). Developing Morally Plausible Indices of Poverty and Gender Equity. Philosophical Topics 37 (2):199-221.
Katalin Farkas (2008). Time, Tense, Truth. Synthese 160 (2):269 - 284.
Takashi Yagisawa (2002). Primitive Worlds. Acta Analytica 17 (1):19-37.
Philip Percival (1990). Indices of Truth and Intensional Operators. Theoria 56 (3):148-172.
David Montalvo (2000). On the Propositional Treatment of Anatmavāda in Early Buddhism and Ātmavāda in Hinduism. Asian Philosophy 10 (3):205 – 212.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #78,613 of 549,070 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,070 )
How can I increase my downloads?