David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (3):255 - 274 (2010)
The entire development of modern logic is characterized by various forms of confrontation of what has come to be called proof theory with what has earned the label of model theory. For a long time the widely accepted view was that while model theory captures directly what logical formalisms are about, proof theory is merely our technical means of getting some incomplete grip on this; but in recent decades the situation has altered. Not only did proof theory expand into new realms, generalizing the concept of proof in various directions; many philosophers also realized that meaning may be seen as primarily consisting in certain rules rather than in language-world links. However, the possibility of construing meaning as an inferential role is often seen as essentially compromised by the limits of prooftheoretical means. The aim of this paper is to sort out the cluster of problems besetting logical inferentialism by disentangling and clarifying one of them, namely determining the power of various inferential frameworks as measured by that of explicitly semantic ones
|Keywords||Inference Proof theory Model theory Inferentialism Semantics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert B. Brandom (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press.
Alfred Tarski (1956). Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
J. Michael Dunn (2001). Algebraic Methods in Philosophical Logic. Oxford University Press.
Dag Prawitz (2006). Meaning Approached Via Proofs. Synthese 148 (3):507 - 524.
Citations of this work BETA
Jaroslav Peregrin (2015). Logic Reduced To Bare Bones. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 24 (2):193-209.
James Trafford (2015). Duality and Inferential Semantics. Axiomathes 25 (4):495-513.
Similar books and articles
Heinrich Wansing (2000). The Idea of a Proof-Theoretic Semantics and the Meaning of the Logical Operations. Studia Logica 64 (1):3-20.
Jaroslav Peregrin (2006). Meaning as an Inferential Role. Erkenntnis 64 (1):1-35.
Ruy J. G. B. de Queiroz (2008). On Reduction Rules, Meaning-as-Use, and Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Studia Logica 90 (2):211-247.
David J. Pym (2004). Reductive Logic and Proof-Search: Proof Theory, Semantics, and Control. Oxford University Press.
William R. Stirton (2008). Some Problems for Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):278–298.
Nissim Francez & Roy Dyckhoff (2010). Proof-Theoretic Semantics for a Natural Language Fragment. Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (6):447-477.
Patrizio Contu (2006). The Justification of the Logical Laws Revisited. Synthese 148 (3):573 - 588.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #93,274 of 1,906,922 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #92,032 of 1,906,922 )
How can I increase my downloads?