In the Business of Dying: Questioning the Commercialization of Hospice

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):224-234 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article critically questions the commercialization of hospice care and the ethical concerns associated with the industry's movement toward “market-driven medicine” at the end of life. For example, the article examines issues raised by an influx of for-profit hospice providers whose business model appears at its core to have an ethical conflict of interest between shareholders doing well and terminal patients dying well. Yet, empirical data analyzing the experience of patients across the hospice industry are limited, and general claims that end-of-life patient care is inferior among for-profit providers or even that their business practices are somehow unseemly when compared to nonprofit providers cannot be substantiated. In fact, non-profit providers are not immune to potentially conflicting concerns regarding financial viability (i.e., “no margin, no mission”). Given the limitations of existing empirical data and contrasting ideological commitments of for-profit versus non-profit providers, the questions raised by this article highlight important areas for reflection and further study. Policymakers and regulators are cautioned to keep ethical concerns in the fore as an increasingly commercialized hospice industry continues to emerge as a dominant component of the U.S. health care system. Both practitioners and researchers are encouraged to expand their efforts to better understand how business practices and commercial interests may compromise the death process of the patient and patient's family — a process premised upon a philosophy and ethical tradition that earlier generations of hospice providers and proponents established as a trusted, end-of-life alternative

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Unreconcilable Differences?Bruce Jennings - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 41 (4):4-9.
Volunteering to Be Mortal.Mark A. Mesler - 1998 - Journal of Medical Humanities 19 (1):39-49.
Dependent Rational Providers.K. B. Brothers - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (2):133-147.
Parting: a handbook for spiritual care near the end of life.Jennifer Sutton Holder - 2004 - Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Edited by Jann Aldredge-Clanton.
Autonomy, discourse, and power: A postmodern reflection on principlism and bioethics.Pam McGrath - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (5):516 – 532.
Hospice with a Zen Twist: A Talk with Zen Hospice Founder Frank Ostaseski.Steve Heilig - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (3):322-325.
Multicultural Health Care in Practice.Gert Olthuis & Godelieve Heterevann - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (3):199-206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-12

Downloads
34 (#407,230)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Selling Hospice.Sam Halabi - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (4):442-454.
Selling Hospice.Sam Halabi - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (4):442-454.
Introduction.Larry R. Churchill & Joshua E. Perry - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (4):408-411.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Variation in Patients' Hospice Costs.Haiden A. Huskamp, Joseph P. Newhouse, Jessica Cafarella Norcini & Nancy L. Keating - 2008 - Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing 45 (2):232-244.

Add more references