David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Suppose for a moment, that J.R.R. Tolkien, the famous author of the cult fantasy saga Lord of the Rings, did not publish anything of his writings during his lifetime; suppose that after his death the manuscripts of all his writings are lying on his table. Where, then, is the Middlearth, the glorious land of hobbits, dwarfs, elfs and human heroes, situated? We might be tempted to say that it is within our world, namely inside the pile of the papers on the writer’s table - for it exists solely through the letters written on these papers. However, to say this would be wrong - surely we do not expect that should the heroes of the book walk in a straight line long enough, they would cross the boundaries of the book and appear in Mr. Tolkien’s room. Middlearth is, of course, not within our world - despite existing solely due to certain things which are within it. Now the situation is not substantially different actually, when Middlearth does not exist solely through a single pile of papers, but rather through millions of printed copies of Tolkien’s books and through the minds of millions of their readers. Again, the land exists exclusively through the existence of entities which are parts of our world, but this does not mean that the land itself is a part of our world. The point of this anecdotal excursion is now that this relationship between our world and Middlearth is, in a sense, similar to the relationship between our physical space of things and „the space of reasons“ ; or between „the causal story“ and „the justificatory story“. Like Middlearth, the space of reasons exists exclusively due to us, humans, and our minds, and in this sense we might be tempted to situate it in our world, to see it as a certain, perhaps scattered, compartment of the world of things within which we live; but just as in the case of Middlearth, this might be dangerously misguiding.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Adam D. Pave (2006). Rolling the Cosmic Dice: Fate Found in the Story of Nala and Damayanti. Asian Philosophy 16 (2):99 – 109.
Gregory Currie (2007). Both Sides of the Story: Explaining Events in a Narrative. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 135 (1):49 - 63.
Mark Riedl (2010). Story Planning: Creativity Through Exploration, Retrieval, and Analogical Transformation. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 20 (4):589-614.
Aaron Smuts (2009). Story Identity and Story Type. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67 (1):5-14.
Harold Mattingly (1937). The Story of the Ancient World The Story of the Ancient World From the Earliest Times to the Fall of Rome. By H. A. Clement. Pp. 256; Numerous Figures in Text. London: Harrap, 1936. Cloth, 3s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 51 (05):197-198.
Jennifer Hornsby (2004). Agency and Alienation. Ch. In _Naturalism in Question_. Eds. M. De Caro and D. Macarthur (Harvard UP):173-87.
William Dembski, DARWIN'S MELTDOWN -- Cover Story Http://Www.Worldmag.Com/World/Issue/04-03- 04/Home.Asp.
Charles B. Daniels (1987). “The Story Says That” Operator in Story Semantics. Studia Logica 46 (1):73-86.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #206,607 of 1,907,520 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #197,471 of 1,907,520 )
How can I increase my downloads?