Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||The paper addresses foundational questions concerning the dynamic semantics of natural language based on dynamic logic of the Groenendijko-Stokhofian kind. Discussing a series of model calculi of increasing complexity, it shows in detail how the usual semantics of dynamic logic can be seen as emerging from the account for certain inferential patterns of natural language, namely those governing anaphora. In this way, the current ‘dynamic turn’ of logic is argued to be reasonably seen not as the product of changing the focus of logic from the relation of entailment to „a structure of human cognitive action“ (van Benthem), but rather as merely another step in our long-term effort to master more and more inferential patterns.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Barteld P. Kooi (2003). Probabilistic Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (4):381-408.
Alexander Bochman & Dov M. Gabbay (2012). Sequential Dynamic Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (3):279-298.
Martin Stokhof (1991). Dynamic Predicate Logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14 (1):39 - 100.
C. F. M. Vermeulen (1993). Sequence Semantics for Dynamic Predicate Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2 (3):217-254.
Reinhard Muskens (1991). Anaphora and the Logic of Change. In [Book Chapter].
Peter Pagin & Dag Westerståhl (1993). Predicate Logic with Flexibly Binding Operators and Natural Language Semantics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2 (2):89-128.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,394 of 729,711 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 729,711 )
How can I increase my downloads?