David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The features of lexical items interact through agreement to influence the shape of syntactic structure and the process of semantic interpretation. We can often tell from the form of a construction that agreement has taken place: the value of a particular feature is morphologically represented on more than one lexical item, even though semantic interpretation may be lacking on some of these lexical items. Less obvious is the nature of the process that yields agreement in the first place. Less obvious as well is the syntax of the output of this process. Because of the central role played by agreement in syntactic theory, much work over the last decade has been devoted to all these topics.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Emmon Bach, ACTL Semantics: Compositionality and Morphosemantics: I: Syntactic and Semantic Assumptions: Compositionality.
Michael R. Baumer (1993). Chasing Aristotle's Categories Down the Tree of Grammar. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:341-449.
William E. Seager (1992). Thought and Syntax. Philosophy of Science Association 1992:481-491.
Yael Ravin (1990). Lexical Semantics Without Thematic Roles. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-02-17
Total downloads22 ( #130,787 of 1,725,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #166,958 of 1,725,863 )
How can I increase my downloads?