David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
AI and Society 13 (3):312-321 (1999)
This paper considers the impact of the AI R&D programme on human society and the individual human being on the assumption that a full realisation of the engineering objective of AI, namely, construction of human-level, domain-independent intelligent entities, is possible. Our assumption is essentially identical tothe maximum progress scenario of the Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress.Specifically, the first section introduces some of the significant issues on the relational nexus among work, education and the human-machine boundary. In particular, based on a Russellian conception of rationality I briefly argue that we need to change our related conceptions of work, employment and free time, through a new human-centred education. On the human-machine boundary problem, I make a couple of tentative suggestions and put forward some crucial open questions.Section two discusses the impact of the emerging machine intelligence on human nature both as modification of its self-image, keeping human nature itself unchanged, and its potential for altering human nature itself. I briefly argue that: (i) in a certain context, the question of the supremacy or uniqueness of human intelligence loses much, if not all, of its ‘weight’; and (ii) appearance of Robot-X species would immortalise the human spirit
|Keywords||Artificial intelligence Free time Human-centred education Human-machine boundary Human nature Work|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Allen Newell (1990). Unified Theories of Cognition. Harvard University Press.
John R. Searle (1980). Minds, Brains and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
Hubert L. Dreyfus (1972). What Computers Can't Do. Harper and Row.
Martin Atkinson & Margaret A. Boden (1979). Artificial Intelligence and Natural Man. Philosophical Quarterly 29 (116):278.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard S. Rosenberg (2007). The Social Impact of Intelligent Artefacts. AI and Society 22 (3):367-383.
Mehmet Tevfik Ozcan (2008). The Rule of Law and Human Virtue. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 40:91-105.
Karamjit S. Gill (1996). The Human-Centred Movement: The British Context. [REVIEW] AI and Society 10 (2):109-126.
Pierpaolo Donati (2012). Doing Sociology in The Age of Globalization. World Futures 68 (4-5):225 - 247.
Dietrich Brandt & Janko Cernetic (1998). Human-Centred Appraoches to Control and Information Technology: European Experiences. [REVIEW] AI and Society 12 (1-2):2-20.
Wang Xinyan (2006). Globalization and Common Human Interests. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:173-177.
Mario Giampietro & Sandra G. F. Bukkens (1992). Sustainable Development: Scientific and Ethical Assessments. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (1):27-57.
Xinyan Zhang (2008). Dynamics of Human Society. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 46:117-119.
Jonathan Wolff (2012). The Demands of the Human Right to Health. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1):217-237.
John Tasioulas (2009). Are Human Rights Essentially Triggers for Intervention? Philosophy Compass 4 (6):938-950.
Peter Day (1996). The Human-Centred Information Society: A Community-Based Approach. [REVIEW] AI and Society 10 (2):181-198.
Oseni Taiwo Afisi, Scientific–Technological Revolution: A Means of Enhanced Productivity in Human Society.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads18 ( #172,982 of 1,777,953 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,352 of 1,777,953 )
How can I increase my downloads?