Philosophical Review 99 (4):565-592 (1990)
|Abstract||Granted that desire is always present in the genesis of human action, is it something on the presence of which the agent always reflects? I may act on a belief without coming to recognize that I have the belief. Can I act on a desire without recognizing that I have the desire? In particular, can the desire have a motivational presence in my decision making, figuring in the background, as it were, without appearing in the content of my deliberation, in the foreground? We argue, perhaps unsurprisingly, that yes, desire can figure in the background without figuring in the foreground: we call this the strict background view of desire. But we then show, and this is where the surprise comes, that the strict background view of desire has significant implications for contemporary moral philosophy.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christopher G. Framarin (2006). The Desire You Are Required to Get Rid Of: A Functionalist Analysis of Desire in the Bhagavadgita. Philosophy East and West 56 (4):604-+.
Timothy Schroeder (2004). Three Faces of Desire. Oxford University Press.
Reginald Jackson (1943). Bishop Butler's Refutation of Psychological Hedonism. Philosophy 18 (70):114-.
Chris Meyers (2005). Wants and Desires: A Critique of Conativist Theory of Motivation. Journal of Philosophical Research 30:357-370.
John Collins (1995). Desire-as-Belief Implies Opinionation or Indifference. Analysis 55 (1):2 - 5.
Dennis W. Stampe (1987). The Authority of Desire. Philosophical Review 96 (July):335-81.
Charles B. Cross (2008). Nonbelief and the Desire-as-Belief Thesis. Acta Analytica 23 (2):115-124.
David Wall (2009). Are There Passive Desires? Dialectica 63 (2):133-155.
Steven Arkonovich (2012). Conflicts of Desire. Journal of Value Inquiry 46 (1):51-63.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads45 ( #24,468 of 548,976 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,438 of 548,976 )
How can I increase my downloads?