Philosophical Psychology 7 (4):463-469 (1994)
|Abstract||Before embarking upon the project of reformulating psychoanalysis in the 'scientific' terminology of cognitive science, we should first clearly define what psychoanalysis is about and what it is not about. Cognitive science is based upon a functionalistic philosophy of the mind. As a consequence such a project would require a functionalistic core theory of psychoanalysis. But Freud's claim of the therapeutic effect of psychoanalysis, attained through the rendering conscious of what is unconscious or the making personal of what is experienced by the neurotic patient as impersonal, cannot be explained by a functionalistic theory of the mind We examine Freud's claim and conclude that there ought to be a philosophy of qualia at the core of psychoanalysis|
|Keywords||Cognition Functionalism Psychoanalysis Science Freud|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Louise Braddock & Michael Lacewing (eds.) (2007). The Academic Face of Psychoanalysis: Papers in Philosophy, the Humanities, and the British Clinical Tradition. Routledge.
Margaret Nash (1989). Gr Nbaum and Psychoanalysis. Philosophical Psychology 2 (3):325 – 343.
Lavinia Gomez (2005). The Freud Wars: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Routledge.
André Haynal (1993). Psychoanalysis and the Sciences: Epistemology--History. University of California Press.
Barry Richards (1989). Images of Freud: Cultural Responses to Psychoanalysis. St. Martin's Press.
J. Bouveresse (1995). Wittgenstein Reads Freud: The Myth of the Unconscious. Princeton University Press.
Robert C. Richardson (1990). The "Tally Argument" and the Validation of Psychoanalysis. Philosophy of Science 57 (4):668-676.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #131,679 of 722,813 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,813 )
How can I increase my downloads?