Dispositioning and the Sciences of Complexity

Behavior and Philosophy 37:135 - 140 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Field and Hineline use the term dispositioning to refer to the tendency to privilege spatially and temporally local entities in psychological explanation. In our commentary we offer reasons for agreeing with their claim that dispositioning is overly prevalent and should be avoided. Drawing on lessons from the sciences of complexity and the ecological approach to perception and action, we suggest some directions for a new approach to explanation in psychology and in science generally

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Explaining Behavior.Sigrid S. Glenn - 2009 - Behavior and Philosophy 37:149 - 150.
Complexity and sustainability.Jennifer Wells - 2013 - New York: Routledge.
Structure and domain-independence in the formal sciences.James Franklin - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30:721-723.
Complexity: From formal analysis to final action.Douglas Frye & Philip David Zelazo - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):836-837.
Mathematics in the biological sciences.Not By Me - 1992 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (3):241 – 248.
The Foundations of Complexity, the Complexity of Foundations.Erika Cudworth & Stephen Hobden - 2012 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (2):163-187.
The complexity of science.H. P. P. Lotter - 1999 - Koers 64 (4):499-520.
Where is Morin's road to complexity going?Laurent Dobuzinskis - 2004 - World Futures 60 (5 & 6):433 – 455.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-17

Downloads
17 (#815,534)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations