Depoliticizing Democracy
Ratio Juris 17 (1):52-65 (2004)
| Abstract | It is now widely accepted as an ideal that democracy should be as deliberative as possible. Democracy should not involve a tussle between different interest groups or lobbies in which the numbers matter more than the arguments. And it should not be a system in which the only arguments that matter are those that voters conduct in an attempt to determine where their private or sectional advantage lies. Democracy, it is said, should promote public deliberation among citizens and authorities as to what does best for the society as a whole and should elicit decision-making on that basis. But the ideal of deliberative democracy has two components—the deliberative and the democratic—and often they pull apart. In this paper I look in the first section at a series of problems that arise on the deliberative front, arguing that their resolution requires various degrees of depoliticization. And then I ask in the second whether the depoliticizing responses that those problems require are antithetical to the ideal of democracy. I argue that they are not in tension with the ideal, if that ideal is cast in the relatively revisionary, two-dimensional form that I favour | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJoseph Femia (1996). Complexity and Deliberative Democracy. Inquiry 39 (3 & 4):359 – 397.
Joshua Cohen (2009). Philosophy, Politics, Democracy: Selected Essays. Harvard University Press.
Denise Vitale (2006). Between Deliberative and Participatory Democracy: A Contribution on Habermas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (6):739-766.
John Parkinson (2006). Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. OUP Oxford.
Philip Pettit (2001). Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma. Noûs 35 (s1):268-299.
Thom Brooks (2009). A Critique of Pragmatism and Deliberative Democracy. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 50-54.
M. Bacon (2010). The Politics of Truth: A Critique of Peircean Deliberative Democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (9):1075-1091.
John S. Dryzek (2005). Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia. Political Theory 33 (2):218 - 242.
Robert B. Talisse (2004). Does Public Ignorance Defeat Deliberative Democracy? Critical Review 16 (4):455-463.
James Fishkin (2005). Defending Deliberation: A Comment on Ian Shapiro'sThe State of Democratic Theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (1):71-78.
William Smith (2004). Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. Res Publica 10 (4).
Archon Fung (2005). Deliberation Before the Revolution: Toward an Ethics of Deliberative Democracy in an Unjust World. Political Theory 33 (3):397 - 419.
James Bohman (2003). Deliberative Toleration. Political Theory 31 (6):757-779.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-11Total downloads20 ( #61,410 of 548,970 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,970 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
