Mind 96 (384):530-533 (1987)
|Abstract||In 'The Humean Theory of Motivation' Michael Smith attempts two tasks: he offers an account of the debate about motivation between Humeans and anti-Humeans and he provides arguments that are designed to show that the Humeans win. While the paper is of great virtue in clarifying the debate, I believe that it falls short of both its goals. It does not highlight the really central issue between Humeans and anti-Humeans and it does not provide arguments which would settle that issue in favour of the Humean side.|
|Keywords||Humean theory Humeanism Michael Smith|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Neil Sinhababu (2011). The Humean Theory of Practical Irrationality. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6 (1):1-13.
Mark Schroeder (2007). Weighting for a Plausible Humean Theory of Reasons. Noûs 41 (1):110–132.
Harold W. Noonan (2010). Bird Against the Humeans. Ratio 23 (1):73-86.
Joshua May (forthcoming). Because I Believe It’s the Right Thing to Do. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.
Christopher G. Framarin (2008). Motivation-Encompassing Attitudes. Philosophical Explorations 11 (2):121 – 130.
G. F. Schueler (2009). The Humean Theory of Motivation Rejected. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (1):103-122.
Mark van Roojen (2002). Should Motivational Humeans Be Humeans About Rationality? Topoi 21 (1-2):209-215.
Michael Smith (1988). On Humeans, Anti-Humeans, and Motivation: A Reply to Pettit. Mind 97 (388):589-595.
R. Jay Wallace (1990). How to Argue About Practical Reason. Mind 99 (395):355-385.
Mark van Roojen (1995). Humean Motivation and Humean Rationality. Philosophical Studies 79 (1):37-57.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #53,813 of 549,060 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,060 )
How can I increase my downloads?