David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 24 (4):371-387 (2002)
Thomas Jefferson’s argument against long-term debt and his theory of usufruct are used to show why each generation is obligated to protect the independence of future generations. This argument forms the theory of “Jeffersonian generational independence.” The theory has wide implications for the environmental movement because most environmental problems result in limitations on the liberty of future generations. I compare and defend Jeffersonian generational independence from two alternatives including the investment theory raised by James Madison and the problem of generational interdependence raised by John Passmore or Edmund Burke. When the obligation to protect the independence of future generations is taken seriously, liberalism can no longer reasonably be used to defend environmental exploitation, since such exploitation amounts to an attack on the liberty and independence which form its core values
|Keywords||Thomas Jefferson Political Theory Debt|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Jefferson (1941). Jefferson on Plato. Charlottesville, Privately Printed for J. Wyllie [by the Stone Printing and Manufacturing Company, Roanoke.
Jefferson McMahan (1981). Problems of Population Theory:Obligations to Future Generations. R. I. Sikora, Brian Barry. Ethics 92 (1):96-.
Michaelle L. Browers (1999). Jefferson's Land Ethic: Environmental Ideas in Notes on the State of Virginia. Environmental Ethics 21 (1):43-57.
Thomas Jefferson (1999). Thomas Jefferson, Political Writings. Cambridge University Pres.
Daniel J. Boorstin (1981). The Lost World of Thomas Jefferson: With a New Preface. University of Chicago Press.
Itay Ben-Yaacov (2003). Discouraging Results for Ultraimaginary Independence Theory. Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (3):846-850.
Jan Deckers (2011). Negative “GHIs,” the Right to Health Protection, and Future Generations. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):165-176.
Alf Onshuus (2006). Properties and Consequences of Thorn-Independence. Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (1):1 - 21.
Ari Helo & Peter Onuf (2003). Jefferson, Morality, and the Problem of Slavery. The William and Mary Quarterly, Third Series 60 (3):583-614.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #178,779 of 1,088,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,666 of 1,088,810 )
How can I increase my downloads?