Microphysicalism, dottism, and reduction
Analysis 55 (3):141-46 (1995)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Fact Metaphysics Physicalism Science Crane, T Mellor, D H | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesTim Crane (2000). Dualism, Monism, Physicalism. Mind and Society 1 (2):73-85.
Philip Pettit (1994). Microphysicalism Without Contingent Micro-Macro Laws. Analysis 54 (4):253-57.
Chris Daly (1995). Does Physicalism Need Fixing? Analysis 55 (3):135-41.
Angus Menuge (1993). Supervenience, by Chance? Reply to Crane and Mellor. Analysis 53 (4):228-235.
Tim Crane & D. H. Mellor (1990). There is No Question of Physicalism. Mind 99 (394):185-206.
Philip Pettit (1993). A Definition of Physicalism. Analysis 53 (4):213-23.
Daniel N. Robinson (1991). On Crane and Mellor's Argument Against Physicalism. Mind 100 (397):135-36.
Tim Crane (1993). Reply to Pettit. Analysis 53 (4):224-27.
Robert Kirk (1996). Physicalism Lives. Ratio 9 (1):85-89.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads10 ( #106,370 of 549,124 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,124 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
