Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (2):215-232 (2010)
|Abstract||The aim of this paper is to critically discuss the plausibility of legal moralism with an emphasis on some central and recent versions. First, this paper puts forward and defends the thesis that recently developed varieties of legal moralism promoted by Robert P. George, John Kekes and Michael Moore are more plausible than Lord Devlin's traditional account. The main argument for this thesis is that in its more modern versions legal moralism is immune to some of the forceful challenges made to Devlin by Hart, Dworkin and Feinberg among others. Second, however, the paper challenges the new generation of legal moralists and suggests some areas for further development. Although Devlin's position has been scrutinized thoroughly in the literature on the philosophy of law, there has, to my knowledge, been no comparable, systematic critique of these different proponents of legal moralism.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Heta Häyry (1992). Legal Paternalism and Legal Moralism: Devlin, Hart and Ten. Ratio Juris 5 (2):191-201.
Heta Häyry (1991). Liberalism and Legal Moralism: The Hart-Devlin Debate and Beyond. Ratio Juris 4 (2):202-218.
Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2011). What is Legal Moralism? SATS 12 (1):80-88.
Jeffrie G. Murphy (2006). Legal Moralism and Retribution Revisited. Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):5-20.
Gerald Dworkin (2012). Harm and the Volenti Principle. Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):309-321.
R. A. Duff (forthcoming). Towards a Modest Legal Moralism. Criminal Law and Philosophy.
John Kultgen (1985). The Justification of Legal Moralism. Philosophical Topics 13 (2):123-131.
Jeffrie G. Murphy (1966). Another Look at Legal Moralism. Ethics 77 (1):50-56.
Carl F. Cranor (1979). Legal Moralism Reconsidered. Ethics 89 (2):147-164.
Gregory Bassham (2012). Legislating Morality: Scoring the Hart-Devlin Debate After Fifty Years. Ratio Juris 25 (2):117-132.
David O. Brink (2012). Retributivism and Legal Moralism. Ratio Juris 25 (4):496-512.
F. Meyer (forthcoming). Towards a Modest Legal Moralism: Concept, Open Questions, and Potential Extension. Criminal Law and Philosophy.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads25 ( #49,684 of 549,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,753 )
How can I increase my downloads?