New Legal Moralism: Some Strengths and Challenges [Book Review]

Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (2):215-232 (2010)
The aim of this paper is to critically discuss the plausibility of legal moralism with an emphasis on some central and recent versions. First, this paper puts forward and defends the thesis that recently developed varieties of legal moralism promoted by Robert P. George, John Kekes and Michael Moore are more plausible than Lord Devlin's traditional account. The main argument for this thesis is that in its more modern versions legal moralism is immune to some of the forceful challenges made to Devlin by Hart, Dworkin and Feinberg among others. Second, however, the paper challenges the new generation of legal moralists and suggests some areas for further development. Although Devlin's position has been scrutinized thoroughly in the literature on the philosophy of law, there has, to my knowledge, been no comparable, systematic critique of these different proponents of legal moralism.
Keywords Criminal law  Criminalization  Devlin  John Kekes  Legal moralism  Legal theory  Michael Moore  Philosophy of law  Robert P. George
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11572-010-9094-5
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,046
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Joel Feinberg (1987). Harm to Others. Philosophical Review 96 (2):295-298.
Melissa Lane & Ronald Dworkin (1994). Life's Dominion. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (176):413.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2011). What is Legal Moralism? SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):80-88.
Stephen P. Garvey (2013). Was Ellen Wronged? Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):185-216.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2011). What is Legal Moralism? SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):80-88.
Gerald Dworkin (2012). Harm and the Volenti Principle. Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):309-321.
Aaron Smuts (2015). How Not to Defend Response Moralism. Journal of Aesthetic Education 49 (4):19-38.
R. A. Duff (2014). Towards a Modest Legal Moralism. Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):217-235.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

51 ( #87,430 of 1,934,429 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #113,162 of 1,934,429 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.