On the relation between recent neurobiological data on perception (and action) and the Husserlian theory of constitution
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2 (4):281-298 (2003)
The phenomenological theory of constitution promises a solution for the problem of consciousness insofar as it changes the traditional terms of this problem by systematically correlating subject and object in the unifying context of intentional acts. I argue that embodied constitution must depend upon the role of kinesthesia as a constitutive operator. In pursuing the path of intentionality in its descent from an idealistic level of pure constitution to this fully embodied kinesthetic constitution, we are able to gain access to different ontological regions such as physical thing, owned body and shared world. Neuroscience brings to light the somatological correlates of noemata. Bridging the gap between incarnation and naturalisation represents the best way of realizing the foundational program of transcendental phenomenology.
|Keywords||constitution kinesthesia action mirror neurons plasticity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Jenny Slatman (2009). A Strange Hand: On Self-Recognition and Recognition of Another. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (3):321-342.
Similar books and articles
Lynne Rudder Baker (2000). Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View. Cambridge University Press.
Robert A. Wilson (2005). Persons, Social Agency, and Constitution. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (2):49-69.
Nicholas Aroney (2009). The Constitution of a Federal Commonwealth: The Making and Meaning of the Australian Constitution. Cambridge University Press.
N. Gangopadhyay & L. Schilbach (2011). Seeing Minds: A Neurophilosophical Investigation of the Role of Perception-Action Coupling in Social Perception. Social Neuroscience.
Hagit Benbaji (2008). Constitution and the Explanatory Gap. Synthese 161 (2):183-202.
Austin W. Bramwell (2004). Against Originalism: Getting Over the U. S. Constitution. Critical Review 16 (4):431-453.
Tomasz Kakol (2005). The Samep-Relation as a Response to Critics of Baker's Theory of Constitution. Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (5/6):561 - 579.
Pedro M. S. Alves (2008). Objective Time and the Experience of Time: Husserl's Theory of Time in Light of Some Theses of A. Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 24 (3):205-229.
Jean-Luc Petit (1999). Constitution by Movement: Husserl in Light of Recent Neurobiological Findings. In Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Thomas A. Michaud (1987). Schutz's Theory of Constitution. Philosophy Research Archives 13:63-71.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #105,884 of 1,410,530 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #108,810 of 1,410,530 )
How can I increase my downloads?