Episteme 5 (1):pp. 33-55 (2008)
|Abstract||In this paper I defend a pure proceduralist conception of legitimacy that applies to epistemic democracy. This conception, which I call pure epistemic proceduralism, does not depend on procedure-independent standards for good outcomes and relies on a proceduralist epistemology. It identifies a democratic decision as legitimate if it is the outcome of a process that satisfies certain conditions of political and epistemic fairness. My argument starts with a rejection of instrumentalism – the view that political equality is only instrumentally valuable. I reject instrumentalism on two grounds: (i) because it fails to respect reasonable value pluralism and to recognize the constitutive role of democratic procedures for legitimacy in pluralist societies, and (ii) because it neglects the constructive function of democratic decision-making. I then consider two alternatives to pure epistemic proceduralism: David Estlund's version of epistemic proceduralism and a Deweyan account of epistemic democracy. I argue that only pure epistemic proceduralism can make good on both shortcomings of instrumentalism, whereas each of the other two approaches only makes good on one and neglects the other|
|Keywords||epistemic democracy democratic legitimacy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Cillian McBride (2009). Communities of Inquiry and Democratic Politics. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):pp. 71-74.
Elizabeth Anderson (2008). An Epistemic Defense of Democracy: David Estlund's Democratic Authority. Episteme 5 (1):pp. 129-139.
William Nelson (2008). The Epistemic Value of the Democratic Process. Episteme 5 (1):pp. 19-32.
Emanuela Ceva (2008). Impure Procedural Justice and the Management of Conflicts About Values. Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):5-22.
Patrick Tomlin (2012). Should We Be Utopophobes About Democracy in Particular? Political Studies Review 10 (1):36-47.
Don Fallis (2005). Epistemic Value Theory and Social Epistemology. Episteme 2 (3):177-188.
Roger Koppl (2005). Epistemic Systems. Episteme 2 (2):91-106.
Anthony T. Flood (2008). Epistemic Badness. Journal of Philosophical Research 33:253-262.
Fabienne Peter (2007). Democratic Legitimacy and Proceduralist Social Epistemology. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads151 ( #3,303 of 722,698 )
Recent downloads (6 months)65 ( #686 of 722,698 )
How can I increase my downloads?