|Abstract||The simplicity of a theory seems closely related to how well the theory summarizes individual data points. Think, for example, of classic curve-fitting. It is easy to get perfect data-fit with a ‘‘theory’’ that simply lists each point of data, but such a theory is maximally unsimple (for the data-fit). The simple theory suggests instead that there is one underlying curve that summarizes this data, and we usually prefer such a theory even at some expense in data-fit. In general, it seems, theorizing involves looking for regularities or patterns in our experience, and such regularities are interesting to us because they summarize how our experience goes. We could list all the ravens we’ve encountered, and their colors, or we could summarize..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Malcolm R. Forster (1995). The Golfer's Dilemma: A Reply to Kukla on Curve-Fitting. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (3):348-360.
Peter Turney (1990). The Curve Fitting Problem: A Solution. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41 (4):509-530.
Max Coltheart & Martin Davies (2003). Inference and Explanation in Cognitive Neuropsychology. Cortex 39 (1):188-191.
Uljana Feest (2011). What Exactly is Stabilized When Phenomena Are Stabilized? Synthese 182 (1):57-71.
Prasanta S. Bandyopadhayay, Robert J. Boik & Prasun Basu (1996). The Curve Fitting Problem: A Bayesian Approach. Philosophy of Science 63 (3):272.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #49,656 of 549,511 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,511 )
How can I increase my downloads?