The Cloning Debate in the United Kingdom: The Academy Meets the Public

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (3):268-276 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Readers of the Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics need hardly be told that each year a huge amount of very valuable work in bioethics is carried out in the academic's study and the university seminar room and appears in the pages of specialist, restricted-readership journals. However, if it is to be as effective, relevant, and influential as it deserves to be, there arguably comes a point when this work needs to leave the confines of the academy and engage the wider public. This perhaps happens less often than it should

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Cloning: Advocating History of Biology in the Public Interest. [REVIEW]Jane Maienschein - 2001 - Journal of the History of Biology 34 (3):423 - 432.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
18 (#811,325)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Herissone-Kelly
University of Central Lancashire

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references