David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (3):394–406 (2008)
Drawing on material collected amongst Danish and Australian humanities and social science academics, the article illustrates and problematises a particular and recurring discursive practice amongst academics: 'the conduct of concern'. Conceptualising the conduct of concern as an exclusionary and de-legitimising discursive practice, the article offers a (mis)reading of some of the storylines and constructions it could be seen to invoke and reproduce—amongst others, the idea of the autonomous, rational academic subject. The author discusses the conduct of concern, as a particular kind of subject position and positioning, in terms of Donna Haraway's figure 'the modest witness'. The author suggests that the conduct of concern as a readily available exclusionary discursive practice in academia 'smuggles in' and naturalises constructions and positionings associated with the autonomous rational subject, and participates in masking the discourse mobiliser's subjective and political investments. In that way, by appropriating the ubiquitous discursive practice academics might contribute to upholding constructions and practices they otherwise seek to disrupt.
|Keywords||exclusion academic culture modest witness positioning|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Bruno Latour (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press.
Michel Foucault & Colin Gordon (1980). Power/Knowledge Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977.
Donna Jeanne Haraway (1997). Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.Femaleman₋Meets₋Oncomouse: Feminism and Technoscience. Routledge.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jeff Coulter (1999). Discourse and Mind. Human Studies 22 (2-4):163-181.
Edward J. Hackett (2002). Four Observations About “Six Domains of Research Ethics”. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):211-214.
Anna-Maija Lämsä & Teppo Sintonen (2001). A Discursive Approach to Understanding Women Leaders in Working Life. Journal of Business Ethics 34 (3-4):255 - 267.
David Lauer (2012). Expressivism and the Layer Cake Picture of Discursive Practice. Philosophia 40 (1):55-73.
Tanja Pritzlaff (2012). Disagreement, Error and Two Senses of Incompatibility—The Relational Function of Discursive Updating. Philosophia 40 (1):121-138.
Paul G. La Forge (1997). Teaching Business Ethics Through Meditation. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1283-1295.
Paul G. La Forge (1997). Teaching Business Ethics Through Meditation. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12/13):1283 - 1295.
Giuseppe Mininni (2005). Focus: Complexityandpsychology Guest Editors: Giuseppe Mininni and Mauro Maldonato. World Futures 61 (3):165 – 173.
Kenneth Shockley (2006). On Participation and Membership in Discursive Practices. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (1):67-85.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads9 ( #254,415 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #369,877 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?