Graduate studies at Western
AI and Society 23 (3):331-351 (2006)
|Abstract||Contrary to common belief, IT systems often disappoint the expectations to increase productivity and flexibility of work and value creation processes. Moreover, most IT design and implementation projects still fail or burst time and cost budgets to a high extent. After presenting significant empirical evidence for these phenomena, the paper reflects on the reasons for their persistence by developing a semiotic perspective on the processes of dealing with computer artifacts in organisations. This semiotic view allows understanding the processes of designing, implementing and using IT systems as efforts of structuring social practices in organisations. A typical case of enterprise resource planning system implementation illustrates this. Finally, a number of guidelines for an improved practice of designing and appropriating IT systems for effective use in organisations are derived from the theoretical reflections|
|Keywords||Software crisis IT productivity paradox Semiotic perspective on computer artifacts Computers as means of organising Digital organisation|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Han van Diest (2008). Possibilities of Democratisation in Organisations. Social Epistemology 22 (1):97 – 117.
Darren Whobrey (2001). Machine Mentality and the Nature of the Ground Relation. Minds and Machines 11 (3):307-346.
William J. Rapaport (2012). Semiotic Systems, Computers, and the Mind: How Cognition Could Be Computing. International Journal of Signs and Semiotic Systems 2 (1):32-71.
Eva E. Tsahuridu (2006). Anomie and Ethics at Work. Journal of Business Ethics 69 (2):163 - 174.
George Rzevski & Kumkum Prasad (1998). The Synergy of Learning Organisations and Flexible Information Technology. AI and Society 12 (1-2):87-96.
João Queiroz & Charbel Niño El-Hani (2006). Towards a Multi-Level Approach to the Emergence of Meaning Processes in Living Systems. Acta Biotheoretica 54 (3).
Winfried Nöth (2000). Umberto Eco's Semiotic Threshold. Sign Systems Studies 28:49-60.
Colin Wight (2004). Theorizing the Mechanisms of Conceptual and Semiotic Space. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2):283-299.
L. Metcalf & S. Benn (2012). The Corporation is Ailing Social Technology: Creating a 'Fit for Purpose' Design for Sustainability. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 111 (2):195-210.
Ulrich Krohs (2008). Co-Designing Social Systems by Designing Technical Artifacts. In Pieter E. Vermaas, Peter Kroes, Andrew Light & Steven A. Moore (eds.), Philosophy and Design: From Engineering to Architecture. Springer.
Winfried Nöth (2001). Protosemiotics and Physicosemiosis. Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):13-25.
Stefan Artmann (2002). Three Types of Semiotic Indeterminacy in Monod's Philosophy of Modern Biology. Sign Systems Studies 30 (1):149-160.
Timo Maran (2010). Semiotic Modeling of Mimicry with Reference to Brood Parasitism. Sign Systems Studies 38 (1-4):349-376.
Josep M. Lozano & Alfons Sauquet (1999). Integrating Business and Ethical Values Through Practitioner Dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics 22 (3):203 - 217.
Riste Keskpaik (2001). Towards a Semiotic Definition of Trash. Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):313-323.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads4 ( #189,087 of 739,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,269 of 739,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?