David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):373 - 387 (2007)
Political egalitarianism is at the core of most normative conceptions of democratic legitimacy. It finds its minimal expression in the “one person one vote” formula. In the literature on deliberative democracy, political equality is typically interpreted in a more demanding sense, but different interpretations of what political equality requires can be identified. In this paper I shall argue that the attempt to specify political equality in deliberative democracy is affected by a dilemma. I shall illustrate the political egalitarian’s dilemma by a hypothetical choice between two informational bases for political equality: Rawlsian primary goods and Amartya Sen’s capability approach. The political egalitarian’s dilemma reveals a clash between the requirement of ensuring equal possibilities to participate in the democratic process and the requirement of subjecting substantive judgments to deliberative evaluation. As such, the dilemma is a variant of the procedure vs. substance dilemma that is well-known in democratic theory. While it has sometimes been argued that deliberative democracy solves the tension between procedure and substance, the political egalitarian’s dilemma shows that this tension continues within deliberative democracy.
|Keywords||egalitarianism legitimacy deliberative democracy Rawlsian primary goods Amartya Sen’s capability approach|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Amy Gutmann (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
J. Rawls (1995). Political Liberalism. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson (2004). Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton University Press.
Martha C. Nussbaum (2003). Women and Human Development. Mind 112 (446):372-375.
Citations of this work BETA
Dean J. Machin (2013). Political Inequality and the 'Super-Rich': Their Money or (Some of) Their Political Rights. Res Publica 19 (2):121-139.
Similar books and articles
Steven Wall (2007). Democracy and Equality. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):416–438.
Matthias Fritsch (2006). Equal Consideration of All – an Aporetic Project? Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (3):299-323.
Percy B. Lehning (1998). The Coherence of Rawls's Plea for Democratic Equality. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):1-41.
Noëlle McAfee (2008). Democracy and the Political Unconscious. Columbia University Press.
Lars Lindblom (2007). Dissolving the Moral Dilemma of Whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics 76 (4):413 - 426.
Ben Saunders (2010). Democracy, Political Equality, and Majority Rule. Ethics 121 (1):148-177.
Fabienne Peter (2009). Democratic Legitimacy Without Collective Rationality. In Boudewijn Paul de Bruin & Christopher F. Zurn (eds.), New Waves in Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan
Archon Fung (2005). Deliberation Before the Revolution: Toward an Ethics of Deliberative Democracy in an Unjust World. Political Theory 33 (3):397 - 419.
Joshua Cohen (2009). Philosophy, Politics, Democracy: Selected Essays. Harvard University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #77,487 of 1,725,607 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,736 of 1,725,607 )
How can I increase my downloads?