Zygon 43 (3):681-704 (2008)
|Abstract||One task of religion is delivering human beings from evil within and between themselves. Defining good as well-being or functioning well, evil as impaired functioning, and doing evil as impairing the functioning of others, this essay explores how religions in consort with other social institutions might understand and respond to evil in light of contemporary scientific knowledge. To understand evil I use a multicausal approach that includes both biological and sociocultural environmental causes. I illustrate the use of this approach by analyzing how we might understand and respond to human rage and violence.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christopher Hamilton (1999). The Nature of Evil a Reply to Garrard. Philosophical Explorations 2 (2):122 – 138.
Manuel Vargas (2006). Dead Serious: Evil and the Ontology of the Undead. In Richard Greene & K. Silem Mohammed (eds.), The Undead and Philosophy. Open Court.
Adam Morton (2004). On Evil. Routledge.
Marcus G. Singer (2004). The Concept of Evil. Philosophy 79 (2):185-214.
Renée Jeffery (2008). Evil and International Relations: Human Suffering in an Age of Terror. Palgrave Macmillan.
Michael Gelven (1998). This Side of Evil. Marquette University Press.
Daryl Koehn (2005). The Nature of Evil. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lars Fr H. Svendsen (2010). A Philosophy of Evil. Dalkey Archive Press.
Paul Formosa (2007). Understanding Evil Acts. Human Studies 30 (2):57 - 77.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #202,139 of 551,055 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?