David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Review of Metaphysics 62 (2):307-325 (2008)
This paper argues that Husserl’s ethics do not fit into any one of three commonly recognized kinds of ethical theory: virtue (Aristotelian), deontological (Kantian), and consequentialist (especially, utilitarianism). Husserl’s mature ethical theory, in particular, combines a modern, Kantian or Fichtean approach based on a strong concept of a free and active ego capable of shaping its life autonomously through its own will with a more Aristotelian theory of the virtues that help us to shape our lives in order to reach happiness or eudaimonia. The paper presents a historical overview of Husserl’s writings on ethics, divided into two main periods with distinct emphases. It concludes that, on the one hand, Husserl’s theory of the ethical person clarifies the origin of the virtues in the free activity of the subject, and on the other, it extends the voluntaristic conception of subjectivity to encompass the passively constituted habits. In this way, Husserl combines an Aristotelian-style virtue ethics with modern theories of subjectivity. It is this combination of modern and Aristotelian elements in Husserl’s ethics that makes it a systematically fruitful and promising contribution to ethical theory
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sebastian Luft (2005). Husserl's Concept of the 'Transcendental Person': Another Look at the Husserl-Heidegger Relationship. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (2):141-177.
Christopher Arroyo (2009). The Role of Feelings in Husserl's Ethics. Idealistic Studies 39 (1/3):11-22.
Molly Brigid Flynn (2009). The Living Body as the Origin of Culture: What the Shift in Husserl's Notion of “Expression” Tells Us About Cultural Objects. Husserl Studies 25 (1):57-79.
Mirja Hartimo (2012). Husserl and the Algebra of Logic: Husserl's 1896 Lectures. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 22 (1):121-133.
Dan Zahavi (2003). Husserl's Phenomenology. Stanford University Press.
Sebastian Luft (2011). Subjectivity and Lifeworld in Transcendental Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Joel Martinez (2011). Is Virtue Ethics Self-Effacing? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):277-288.
B. Smith (1989). Logic and Formal Ontology. In Husserl’s Phenomenology: A Textbook. University Press of America
Qun Gong (2010). Virtue Ethics and Modern Society—a Response to the Thesis of the Modern Predicament of Virtue Ethics. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (2):255-265.
Jack W. Meiland (1976). Psychologism in Logic: Husserl's Critique. Inquiry 19 (1-4):325 – 339.
Henning Peucker (2012). Husserl's Foundation of the Formal Sciences in His “Logical Investigations”. Axiomathes 22 (1):135-146.
Herman Philipse (1986). The Concept of Intentionality. Philosophy Research Archives 12:293-328.
Thomas Mormann (1991). Husserl's Philosophy of Science and the Semantic Approach. Philosophy of Science 58 (1):61-83.
Ioanna Patsioti-Tsacpounidis (2008). The Truth-Value of the Aristotelian 'Areti'. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 2:165-172.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads33 ( #127,977 of 1,934,735 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #66,508 of 1,934,735 )
How can I increase my downloads?