David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (2):303-333 (2011)
Why is interaction so simple? This article presents a theory of interaction based on the use of shared representations as “coordination tools” (e.g., roundabouts that facilitate coordination of drivers). By aligning their representations (intentionally or unintentionally), interacting agents help one another to solve interaction problems in that they remain predictable, and offer cues for action selection and goal monitoring. We illustrate how this strategy works in a joint task (building together a tower of bricks) and discuss its requirements from a computational viewpoint
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy of Mind Developmental Psychology Philosophy of Science Cognitive Psychology Epistemology Neurosciences|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Michael Bacharach (2006). Beyond Individual Choice: Teams and Frames in Game Theory. Princeton University Press.
Chris L. Baker, Rebecca Saxe & Joshua B. Tenenbaum (2009). Action Understanding as Inverse Planning. Cognition 113 (3):329-349.
Michael Bratman (1987/1999). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Sarah Brown-Schmidt & Agnieszka E. Konopka (2008). Little Houses and Casas Pequeñas: Message Formulation and Syntactic Form in Unscripted Speech with Speakers of English and Spanish. Cognition 109 (2):274-280.
Michel Desmurget & Scott Grafton (2000). Forward Modeling Allows Feedback Control for Fast Reaching Movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (11):423-431.
Citations of this work BETA
Giovanni Pezzulo & Haris Dindo (2013). Intentional Strategies That Make Co-Actors More Predictable: The Case of Signaling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):371-372.
Similar books and articles
Riccardo Fusaroli & Kristian Tylen (2012). Carving Language for Social Coordination: A Dynamical Approach. Interaction Studies 13 (1):103-124.
David Kirsh (2006). Distributed Cognition: A Methodological Note. Pragmatics and Cognition 14 (2):249-262.
Günther Knoblich, Stephen Andrew Butterfill & Natalie Sebanz, Psychological Research on Joint Action : Theory and Data.
John Michael (2011). Shared Emotions and Joint Action. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (2):355-373.
Riccardo Fusaroli, Bahador Bahrami, Karsten Olsen, Andreas Roepstorff, Geraint Rees, Chris Frith & Kristian Tylén (2012). Coming to Terms: Quantifying the Benefits of Linguistic Coordination. Psychological Science 23 (8):931-939.
Kristian Tylén, Ethan Weed, Mikkel Wallentin, Andreas Roepstorff & Chris D. Frith (2010). Language as a Tool for Interacting Minds. Mind and Language 25 (1):3-29.
Ramamohan Paturi, Mathew D. McCubbins & Nicholas Weller, Networked Coordination: Effect of Network Structure Human Subjects' Ability to Solve Coordination Problem.
Charles Fernyhough (2005). What is Internalised? Dialogic Cognitive Representations and the Mediated Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):698-699.
Hanne De Jaegher & Tom Froese (2009). On the Role of Social Interaction in Individual Agency. Adaptive Behavior 17 (5):444-460.
Wai-Tat Fu (2011). A Dynamic Context Model of Interactive Behavior. Cognitive Science 35 (5):874-904.
Robin Clark (2012). Social and Physical Coordination. Interaction Studies 13 (1):66-79.
Jorge Simão (2002). Tools Evolve: The Artificial Selection and Evolution of Paleolithic Stone Tools. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):419-419.
Hanne De Jaegher (2009). Social Understanding Through Direct Perception? Yes, by Interacting. Consciousness & Cognition 18 (2):535-542.
Added to index2011-06-06
Total downloads20 ( #97,074 of 1,410,541 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #109,033 of 1,410,541 )
How can I increase my downloads?