David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 9 (6):473-480 (1990)
Peter French has argued that conglomerate collectivities such as business corporations are moral persons and that aggregate collectivities such as lynch mobs are not. Two arguments are advanced to show that French's claim is flawed. First, the distinction between aggregates and conglomerates is, at best, a distinction of degree, not kind. Moreover, some aggregates show evidence of moral personhood. Second, French's criterion for distinguishing aggregates and conglomerates is based on inadequate grounds. Application of the criterion to specific cases requires an additional judgment of a pragmatic nature which undermines any attempt to demonstrate French's thesis that actual conglomerates are moral persons and aggregates are not. Thus, French's theory is seriously lacking both empirical basis and empirical relevance.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Peter A. French (1987). Collective and Corporate Responsibility. Philosophical Review 96 (1):117-119.
Peter A. French (1979). The Corporation as a Moral Person. American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (3):207 - 215.
Manuel G. Velasquez (1983). Why Corporations Are Not Morally Responsible for Anything They Do. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 2 (3):1-18.
Jere Surber (1983). Individual and Corporate Responsibility. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 2 (4):67-88.
Citations of this work BETA
Patrick Maclagan & Tim Campbell (2011). Focusing on Individuals' Ethical Judgement in Corporate Social Responsibility Curricula. Business Ethics 20 (4):392-404.
S. Douglas Beets (2011). Critical Events in the Ethics of U.S. Corporation History. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (2):193-219.
Patrick Maclagan & Tim Campbell (2011). Focusing on Individuals' Ethical Judgement in Corporate Social Responsibility Curricula. Business Ethics: A European Review 20 (4):392-404.
Similar books and articles
Peter Vallentyne (1988). Gimmicky Representations of Moral Theories. Metaphilosophy 19 (3-4):253-263.
Tom L. Beauchamp (1999). The Failure of Theories of Personhood. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (4):309-324.
Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (2005). You Ought to Be Ashamed of Yourself (When You Violate an Imperfect Moral Obligation). Philosophical Issues 15 (1):193-208.
James Duerlinger (2008). Candrakīrti on the Theories of Persons of the Sāṃmitīyas and Āryasāṃmitīyas. Philosophy East and West 58 (4):pp. 446-469.
Peter A. French (1982). Collective Responsibility and the Practice of Medicine. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (1):65-86.
Michael J. Kerlin (1997). Peter French, Corporate Ethics and the Wizard of Oz. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1431-1438.
P. Eddy Wilson (1994). Corporations, Minors, and Other Innocents — a Reply to R. E. Ewin. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (10):761 - 774.
Rita C. Manning (1984). Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Personhood. Journal of Business Ethics 3 (1):77 - 84.
William G. Weaver (1998). Corporations as Intentional Systems. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (1):87 - 97.
Rita C. Manning (1988). Dismemberment, Divorce and Hostile Takeovers: A Comment on Corporate Moral Personhood. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (8):639 - 643.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #268,614 of 1,796,429 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #282,641 of 1,796,429 )
How can I increase my downloads?