A Living Wage for Research Subjects

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):243-253 (2011)
Abstract
Offering cash payments to research subjects is a common recruiting method, but this practice continues to be controversial because of its potential to compromise the protection of human subjects. Federal regulations and guidelines currently allow researchers to pay subjects for participation, but they say very little about how much researchers can pay their subjects. This paper argues that the federal regulations and guidelines should implement a standard payment formula. It argues for a wage payment model, and critically examines three candidates for a base wage: the nonfarm production wage, the FLSA minimum wage, and a living wage. After showing that the nonfarm production wage is too high to satisfy ethical criteria, and the minimum wage is too low, this paper concludes that the wage payment model with a base wage equivalent to a living wage is the best candidate for a standard payment formula in human subjects research
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,449
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
James A. Anderson & Charles Weijer (2002). The Research Subject as Wage Earner. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (4-5):359-376.

View all 13 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
James A. Anderson & Charles Weijer (2002). The Research Subject as Wage Earner. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (4-5):359-376.
Philippa Smales (2010). Living Wages and Institutional Supply Chain Duties. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 29 (1/4):109-134.
Amy E. Wendling (2007). Rough, Foul-Mouthed Boys. Radical Philosophy Today 2007:49-67.
Simon Wigley (2006). Voluntary Losses and Wage Compensation. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (3):363-376.
Norman E. Bowie (2003). Sweatshops and Respect for Persons. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (2):221-242.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-05-12

Total downloads

7 ( #189,127 of 1,103,217 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #121,213 of 1,103,217 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.