David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (2):243-253 (2011)
Offering cash payments to research subjects is a common recruiting method, but this practice continues to be controversial because of its potential to compromise the protection of human subjects. Federal regulations and guidelines currently allow researchers to pay subjects for participation, but they say very little about how much researchers can pay their subjects. This paper argues that the federal regulations and guidelines should implement a standard payment formula. It argues for a wage payment model, and critically examines three candidates for a base wage: the nonfarm production wage, the FLSA minimum wage, and a living wage. After showing that the nonfarm production wage is too high to satisfy ethical criteria, and the minimum wage is too low, this paper concludes that the wage payment model with a base wage equivalent to a living wage is the best candidate for a standard payment formula in human subjects research
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Alan Wertheimer (1996). Exploitation. Princeton University Press.
James Wilson & David Hunter (2010). Research Exceptionalism. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (8):45-54.
A. Wertheimer & F. G. Miller (2008). Payment for Research Participation: A Coercive Offer? Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):389-392.
Nancy M. P. King (2000). Defining and Describing Benefit Appropriately in Clinical Trials. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 28 (4):332-343.
J. P. Bentley (2004). The Influence of Risk and Monetary Payment on the Research Participation Decision Making Process. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):293-298.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Trisha Phillips (2011). Exploitation in Payments to Research Subjects. Bioethics 25 (4):209-219.
James A. Anderson & Charles Weijer (2002). The Research Subject as Wage Earner. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (4-5):359-376.
Terrence P. Mc Eachern (2005). The Inducement of Meaningful Work: A Response to Anderson and Weijer. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (5):427-430.
T. M. Wilkinson (2004). The Ethics and Economics of the Minimum Wage. Economics and Philosophy 20 (2):351-374.
Philippa Smales (2010). Living Wages and Institutional Supply Chain Duties. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 29 (1/4):109-134.
Amy E. Wendling (2007). Rough, Foul-Mouthed Boys. Radical Philosophy Today 2007:49-67.
Amy E. Wendling (2007). Rough, Foul-Mouthed Boys: Women’s Monstrous Laboring Bodies. Radical Philosophy Today 5:49-67.
Simon Wigley (2006). Voluntary Losses and Wage Compensation. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (3):363-376.
Glen Whitman (1996). Myth, Measurement, and the Minimum Wage: Sound and Fury Signifying What? Critical Review 10 (4):607-619.
Erkki Koskela & Panu Poutvaara, Flexible Outsourcing and the Impacts of Labour Taxation in European Welfare States.
Nancy King Reame (2001). Treating Research Subjects as Unskilled Wage Earners: A Risky Business. American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):53-54.
Norman E. Bowie (2003). Sweatshops and Respect for Persons. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (2):221-242.
Denis G. Arnold & Norman E. Bowie (2003). Sweatshops and Respect for Persons. Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (2):221-242.
Kathleen Haley (2000). Prospering with the Living Wage. Business Ethics 14 (5):6-6.
Richard Schmitt (2006). Can the Alienated Make a Socialist Revolution? Reflections About the Prospects for Socialism. Radical Philosophy Today 2006:175-194.
Added to index2011-05-12
Total downloads17 ( #217,180 of 1,907,659 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #340,539 of 1,907,659 )
How can I increase my downloads?