Complete Analysis and Clarificatory Analysis in Wittgenstein's Tractatus
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Michael Beaney (ed.), The Analytic Turn: Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology. Routledge 164 (2007)
I examine the relationship between complete analysis and clarificatory analysis and explain why Wittgenstein thought he required both in his account of how to solve the problems of philosophy. I first describe Wittgenstein’s view of how philosophical confusions arise, by explaining how it is possible to misunderstand the logic of everyday language. I argue that any method of logical analysis in the Tractatus will inevitably be circular, but explain why this does not threaten the prospect of solving philosophical problems. I distinguish between complete and clarificatory analysis and argue that Wittgenstein’s ‘strictly correct’ philosophical method is clarificatory analysis. Finally I discuss the relationship between the two forms of analysis and claim that, although, at the time of writing the Tractatus, Wittgenstein believed that the possibility of complete analysis underpins clarificatory analysis, in fact this was a mistake. In the Philosophical Investigations complete analysis is rejected and clarificatory analysis is retained.
|Keywords||Ludwig Wittgenstein Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus analysis logic clarification philosophical method|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Denis McManus (2006). The Enchantment of Words: Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Oxford University Press.
Matthew B. Ostrow (2002). Wittgenstein's Tractatus: A Dialectical Interpretation. Cambridge University Press.
E. D. Klemke (1971). Essays on Wittgenstein. Urbana,University of Illinois Press.
Pete Mandik (2007). Picturing, Showing, and Solipsism in Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Analysis and Metaphysics 6 (1).
Hong LI & Donghui HAN (2007). What is "the Ineffable" Exactly? An Extensive Reading of Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):402 - 411.
Alfred Nordmann (2005). Wittgenstein's Tractatus: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Ludwig Wittgenstein (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Dover Publications.
Oskari Kuusela (2008). The Struggle Against Dogmatism: Wittgenstein and the Concept of Philosophy. Harvard University Press.
Timm Lampert (2003). Psychophysical and Tractarian Analysis. Perspectives on Science 11 (3):285-317.
Dawn M. Phillips (2006). Clear as Mud. Journal of Philosophical Research 31:277-294.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-03-13
Total downloads1 ( #776,464 of 1,902,209 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,168 of 1,902,209 )
How can I increase my downloads?